Subject: sched/rt: Fix wait_task_interactive() to test rt_spin_lock state
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:55:33 -0500

The wait_task_interactive() will have a task sleep waiting for another
task to have a certain state. But it ignores the rt_spin_locks state
and can return with an incorrect result if the task it is waiting
for is blocked on a rt_spin_lock() and is waking up.

The rt_spin_locks save the tasks state in the saved_state field
and the wait_task_interactive() must also test that state.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>
Cc: John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Clark Williams <clark.williams@gmail.com>
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120301190345.979435764@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Index: linux-stable/kernel/sched/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-stable.orig/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ linux-stable/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1172,7 +1172,8 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct 
 		 * is actually now running somewhere else!
 		 */
 		while (task_running(rq, p)) {
-			if (match_state && unlikely(p->state != match_state))
+			if (match_state && unlikely(p->state != match_state)
+			    && unlikely(p->saved_state != match_state))
 				return 0;
 			cpu_relax();
 		}
@@ -1187,7 +1188,8 @@ unsigned long wait_task_inactive(struct 
 		running = task_running(rq, p);
 		on_rq = p->on_rq;
 		ncsw = 0;
-		if (!match_state || p->state == match_state)
+		if (!match_state || p->state == match_state
+		    || p->saved_state == match_state)
 			ncsw = p->nvcsw | LONG_MIN; /* sets MSB */
 		task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &flags);