tree 65fbc9c0df5a2989b68882ce1d893a0d78134c6a
parent f022814633e1c600507b3a99691b4d624c2813f0
parent 3986f65d4f408ce9d0a361e3226a3246a5fb701c
author Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1648401443 -0700
committer Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1648401443 -0700
mergetag object 3986f65d4f408ce9d0a361e3226a3246a5fb701c
 type commit
 tag x86_core_for_5.18_rc1
 tagger Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> 1648307309 +0100
 
 Add support for Intel CET-IBT, available since Tigerlake (11th gen), which is a
 coarse grained, hardware based, forward edge Control-Flow-Integrity mechanism
 where any indirect CALL/JMP must target an ENDBR instruction or suffer #CP.
 
 Additionally, since Alderlake (12th gen)/Sapphire-Rapids, speculation is
 limited to 2 instructions (and typically fewer) on branch targets not starting
 with ENDBR. CET-IBT also limits speculation of the next sequential instruction
 after the indirect CALL/JMP [1].
 
 CET-IBT is fundamentally incompatible with retpolines, but provides, as
 described above, speculation limits itself.
 
 [1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQJJBAABCgAzFiEEv3OU3/byMaA0LqWJdkfhpEvA5LoFAmI/LI8VHHBldGVyekBp
 bmZyYWRlYWQub3JnAAoJEHZH4aRLwOS6ZnkP/2QCgQLTu6oRxv9O020CHwlaSEeD
 1Hoy3loum5q5hAi1Ik3dR9p0H5u64c9qbrBVxaFoNKaLt5GKrtHaDSHNk2L/CFHX
 urpH65uvTLxbyZzcahkAahoJ71XU+m7PcrHLWMunw9sy10rExYVsUOlFyoyG6XCF
 BDCNZpdkC09ZM3vwlWGMZd5Pp+6HcZNPyoV9tpvWAS2l+WYFWAID7mflbpQ+tA8b
 y/hM6b3Ud0rT2ubuG1iUpopgNdwqQZ+HisMPGprh+wKZkYwS2l8pUTrz0MaBkFde
 go7fW16kFy2HQzGm6aIEBmfcg0palP/mFVaWP0zS62LwhJSWTn5G6xWBr3yxSsht
 9gWCiI0oDZuTg698MedWmomdG2SK6yAuZuqmdKtLLoWfWgviPEi7TDFG/cKtZdAW
 ag8GM8T4iyYZzpCEcWO9GWbjo6TTGq30JBQefCBG47GjD0csv2ubXXx0Iey+jOwT
 x3E8wnv9dl8V9FSd/tMpTFmje8ges23yGrWtNpb5BRBuWTeuGiBPZED2BNyyIf+T
 dmewi2ufNMONgyNp27bDKopY81CPAQq9cVxqNm9Cg3eWPFnpOq2KGYEvisZ/rpEL
 EjMQeUBsy/C3AUFAleu1vwNnkwP/7JfKYpN00gnSyeQNZpqwxXBCKnHNgOMTXyJz
 beB/7u2KIUbKEkSN
 =jZfK
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'x86_core_for_5.18_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull x86 CET-IBT (Control-Flow-Integrity) support from Peter Zijlstra:
 "Add support for Intel CET-IBT, available since Tigerlake (11th gen),
  which is a coarse grained, hardware based, forward edge
  Control-Flow-Integrity mechanism where any indirect CALL/JMP must
  target an ENDBR instruction or suffer #CP.

  Additionally, since Alderlake (12th gen)/Sapphire-Rapids, speculation
  is limited to 2 instructions (and typically fewer) on branch targets
  not starting with ENDBR. CET-IBT also limits speculation of the next
  sequential instruction after the indirect CALL/JMP [1].

  CET-IBT is fundamentally incompatible with retpolines, but provides,
  as described above, speculation limits itself"

[1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html

* tag 'x86_core_for_5.18_rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (53 commits)
  kvm/emulate: Fix SETcc emulation for ENDBR
  x86/Kconfig: Only allow CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT with ld.lld >= 14.0.0
  x86/Kconfig: Only enable CONFIG_CC_HAS_IBT for clang >= 14.0.0
  kbuild: Fixup the IBT kbuild changes
  x86/Kconfig: Do not allow CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI=y with llvm-objcopy
  x86: Remove toolchain check for X32 ABI capability
  x86/alternative: Use .ibt_endbr_seal to seal indirect calls
  objtool: Find unused ENDBR instructions
  objtool: Validate IBT assumptions
  objtool: Add IBT/ENDBR decoding
  objtool: Read the NOENDBR annotation
  x86: Annotate idtentry_df()
  x86,objtool: Move the ASM_REACHABLE annotation to objtool.h
  x86: Annotate call_on_stack()
  objtool: Rework ASM_REACHABLE
  x86: Mark __invalid_creds() __noreturn
  exit: Mark do_group_exit() __noreturn
  x86: Mark stop_this_cpu() __noreturn
  objtool: Ignore extra-symbol code
  objtool: Rename --duplicate to --lto
  ...