tree 9b45cbf2914f440486b7b08e726e088f3a53670d
parent 200491875ce144fdc49827387fff2f604b73c0a9
author Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> 1708633856 -0800
committer Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> 1708633856 -0800

xfs: repair cannot update the summary counters when logging quota flags

While running xfs/804 (quota repairs racing with fsstress), I observed a
filesystem shutdown in the primary sb write verifier:

run fstests xfs/804 at 2022-05-23 18:43:48
XFS (sda4): Mounting V5 Filesystem
XFS (sda4): Ending clean mount
XFS (sda4): Quotacheck needed: Please wait.
XFS (sda4): Quotacheck: Done.
XFS (sda4): EXPERIMENTAL online scrub feature in use. Use at your own risk!
XFS (sda4): SB ifree sanity check failed 0xb5 > 0x80
XFS (sda4): Metadata corruption detected at xfs_sb_write_verify+0x5e/0x100 [xfs], xfs_sb block 0x0
XFS (sda4): Unmount and run xfs_repair

The "SB ifree sanity check failed" message was a debugging printk that I
added to the kernel; observe that 0xb5 - 0x80 = 53, which is less than
one inode chunk.

I traced this to the xfs_log_sb calls from the online quota repair code,
which tries to clear the CHKD flags from the superblock to force a
mount-time quotacheck if the repair fails.  On a V5 filesystem,
xfs_log_sb updates the ondisk sb summary counters with the current
contents of the percpu counters.  This is done without quiescing other
writer threads, which means it could be racing with a thread that has
updated icount and is about to update ifree.

If the other write thread had incremented ifree before updating icount,
the repair thread will write icount > ifree into the logged update.  If
the AIL writes the logged superblock back to disk before anyone else
fixes this siutation, this will lead to a write verifier failure, which
causes a filesystem shutdown.

Resolve this problem by updating the quota flags and calling
xfs_sb_to_disk directly, which does not touch the percpu counters.
While we're at it, we can elide the entire update if the selected qflags
aren't set.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>