patches.runtime_pm/0038-PM-Runtime-Allow-_put_sync-from-interrupts-disabled-.patch

From fe65f70e3ddea03d11ba56bed454621f2aad9961 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 21:45:20 +0200
Subject: PM / Runtime: Allow _put_sync() from interrupts-disabled context

Currently the use of pm_runtime_put_sync() is not safe from
interrupts-disabled context because rpm_idle() will release the
spinlock and enable interrupts for the idle callbacks.  This enables
interrupts during a time where interrupts were expected to be
disabled, and can have strange side effects on drivers that expected
interrupts to be disabled.

This is not a bug since the documentation clearly states that only
_put_sync_suspend() is safe in IRQ-safe mode.

However, pm_runtime_put_sync() could be made safe when in IRQ-safe
mode by releasing the spinlock but not re-enabling interrupts, which
is what this patch aims to do.

Problem was found when using some buggy drivers that set
pm_runtime_irq_safe() and used _put_sync() in interrupts-disabled
context.

Reported-by: Colin Cross <ccross@google.com>
Tested-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
(cherry picked from commit 02b26774afebb2d62695ba3230319d70d8c6cc2d)

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
---
 Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt |   10 +++++-----
 drivers/base/power/runtime.c       |   10 ++++++++--
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt b/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
index 14dd3c6..4ce5450 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt
@@ -54,11 +54,10 @@ referred to as subsystem-level callbacks in what follows.
 By default, the callbacks are always invoked in process context with interrupts
 enabled.  However, subsystems can use the pm_runtime_irq_safe() helper function
 to tell the PM core that a device's ->runtime_suspend() and ->runtime_resume()
-callbacks should be invoked in atomic context with interrupts disabled
-(->runtime_idle() is still invoked the default way).  This implies that these
-callback routines must not block or sleep, but it also means that the
-synchronous helper functions listed at the end of Section 4 can be used within
-an interrupt handler or in an atomic context.
+callbacks should be invoked in atomic context with interrupts disabled.
+This implies that these callback routines must not block or sleep, but it also
+means that the synchronous helper functions listed at the end of Section 4 can
+be used within an interrupt handler or in an atomic context.
 
 The subsystem-level suspend callback is _entirely_ _responsible_ for handling
 the suspend of the device as appropriate, which may, but need not include
@@ -483,6 +482,7 @@ pm_runtime_suspend()
 pm_runtime_autosuspend()
 pm_runtime_resume()
 pm_runtime_get_sync()
+pm_runtime_put_sync()
 pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend()
 
 5. Runtime PM Initialization, Device Probing and Removal
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
index 8dc247c..acb3f83 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -226,11 +226,17 @@ static int rpm_idle(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
 		callback = NULL;
 
 	if (callback) {
-		spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+		if (dev->power.irq_safe)
+			spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
+		else
+			spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 
 		callback(dev);
 
-		spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
+		if (dev->power.irq_safe)
+			spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
+		else
+			spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
 	}
 
 	dev->power.idle_notification = false;
-- 
1.7.10.1.362.g242cab3