gre: fix spelling in comments
The original spelling and bad word choice makes these comments hard to read.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <email@example.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <firstname.lastname@example.org>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c b/net/ipv4/ip_gre.c
index 6b3ca5b..38673d2 100644
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
it is infeasible task. The most general solutions would be
to keep skb->encapsulation counter (sort of local ttl),
and silently drop packet when it expires. It is a good
- solution, but it supposes maintaing new variable in ALL
+ solution, but it supposes maintaining new variable in ALL
skb, even if no tunneling is used.
Current solution: xmit_recursion breaks dead loops. This is a percpu
@@ -91,14 +91,14 @@
One of them is to parse packet trying to detect inner encapsulation
made by our node. It is difficult or even impossible, especially,
- taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, tt is not solution at all.
+ taking into account fragmentation. TO be short, ttl is not solution at all.
Current solution: The solution was UNEXPECTEDLY SIMPLE.
We force DF flag on tunnels with preconfigured hop limit,
that is ALL. :-) Well, it does not remove the problem completely,
but exponential growth of network traffic is changed to linear
(branches, that exceed pmtu are pruned) and tunnel mtu
- fastly degrades to value <68, where looping stops.
+ rapidly degrades to value <68, where looping stops.
Yes, it is not good if there exists a router in the loop,
which does not force DF, even when encapsulating packets have DF set.
But it is not our problem! Nobody could accuse us, we made
@@ -457,8 +457,8 @@
GRE tunnels with enabled checksum. Tell them "thank you".
Well, I wonder, rfc1812 was written by Cisco employee,
- what the hell these idiots break standrads established
- by themself???
+ what the hell these idiots break standards established
+ by themselves???
const struct iphdr *iph = (const struct iphdr *)skb->data;