patches/net-fix-use-after-free-in-the-recvmmsg-exit-path.patch

From 34b88a68f26a75e4fded796f1a49c40f82234b7d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 09:56:35 -0300
Subject: net: Fix use after free in the recvmmsg exit path

commit 34b88a68f26a75e4fded796f1a49c40f82234b7d upstream.

The syzkaller fuzzer hit the following use-after-free:

  Call Trace:
   [<ffffffff8175ea0e>] __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x3e/0x40 mm/kasan/report.c:295
   [<ffffffff851cc31a>] __sys_recvmmsg+0x6fa/0x7f0 net/socket.c:2261
   [<     inline     >] SYSC_recvmmsg net/socket.c:2281
   [<ffffffff851cc57f>] SyS_recvmmsg+0x16f/0x180 net/socket.c:2270
   [<ffffffff86332bb6>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x16/0x7a
  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:185

And, as Dmitry rightly assessed, that is because we can drop the
reference and then touch it when the underlying recvmsg calls return
some packets and then hit an error, which will make recvmmsg to set
sock->sk->sk_err, oops, fix it.

Reported-and-Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Fixes: a2e2725541fa ("net: Introduce recvmmsg socket syscall")
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160122211644.GC2470@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
 net/socket.c |   38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

--- a/net/socket.c
+++ b/net/socket.c
@@ -2332,31 +2332,31 @@ int __sys_recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghd
 			break;
 	}
 
-out_put:
-	fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
-
 	if (err == 0)
-		return datagrams;
+		goto out_put;
+
+	if (datagrams == 0) {
+		datagrams = err;
+		goto out_put;
+	}
 
-	if (datagrams != 0) {
+	/*
+	 * We may return less entries than requested (vlen) if the
+	 * sock is non block and there aren't enough datagrams...
+	 */
+	if (err != -EAGAIN) {
 		/*
-		 * We may return less entries than requested (vlen) if the
-		 * sock is non block and there aren't enough datagrams...
+		 * ... or  if recvmsg returns an error after we
+		 * received some datagrams, where we record the
+		 * error to return on the next call or if the
+		 * app asks about it using getsockopt(SO_ERROR).
 		 */
-		if (err != -EAGAIN) {
-			/*
-			 * ... or  if recvmsg returns an error after we
-			 * received some datagrams, where we record the
-			 * error to return on the next call or if the
-			 * app asks about it using getsockopt(SO_ERROR).
-			 */
-			sock->sk->sk_err = -err;
-		}
-
-		return datagrams;
+		sock->sk->sk_err = -err;
 	}
+out_put:
+	fput_light(sock->file, fput_needed);
 
-	return err;
+	return datagrams;
 }
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE5(recvmmsg, int, fd, struct mmsghdr __user *, mmsg,