objtool: Support unoptimized frame pointer setup
Arnd Bergmann reported a bunch of warnings like:
crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_fold_time()+0x3b: call without frame pointer save/setup
crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_stuck()+0x1d: call without frame pointer save/setup
crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_unbiased_bit()+0x15: call without frame pointer save/setup
crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_read_entropy()+0x32: call without frame pointer save/setup
crypto/jitterentropy.o: warning: objtool: jent_entropy_collector_free()+0x19: call without frame pointer save/setup
and
arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: collect_events uses BP as a scratch register
arch/x86/events/core.o: warning: objtool: events_ht_sysfs_show()+0x22: call without frame pointer save/setup
With certain rare configurations, GCC sometimes sets up the frame
pointer with:
lea (%rsp),%rbp
instead of:
mov %rsp,%rbp
The instructions are equivalent, so treat the former like the latter.
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a468af8b28a69b83fffc6d7668be9b6fcc873699.1506526584.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
1 file changed
