patches/iommu-vt-d-don-t-disable-preemption-while-accessing-.patch

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 17:16:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: don't disable preemption while accessing
 deferred_flush()

get_cpu() disables preemption and returns the current CPU number. The
CPU number is later only used once while retrieving the address of the
local's CPU deferred_flush pointer.
We can instead use raw_cpu_ptr() while we remain preemptible. The worst
thing that can happen is that flush_unmaps_timeout() is invoked multiple
times: once by taskA after seeing HIGH_WATER_MARK and then preempted to
another CPU and then by taskB which saw HIGH_WATER_MARK on the same CPU
as taskA. It is also likely that ->size got from HIGH_WATER_MARK to 0
right after its read because another CPU invoked flush_unmaps_timeout()
for this CPU.
The access to flush_data is protected by a spinlock so even if we get
migrated to another CPU or preempted - the data structure is protected.

While at it, I marked deferred_flush static since I can't find a
reference to it outside of this file.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c |    8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ struct deferred_flush_data {
 	struct deferred_flush_table *tables;
 };
 
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct deferred_flush_data, deferred_flush);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct deferred_flush_data, deferred_flush);
 
 /* bitmap for indexing intel_iommus */
 static int g_num_of_iommus;
@@ -3720,10 +3720,8 @@ static void add_unmap(struct dmar_domain
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
 	struct deferred_flush_entry *entry;
 	struct deferred_flush_data *flush_data;
-	unsigned int cpuid;
 
-	cpuid = get_cpu();
-	flush_data = per_cpu_ptr(&deferred_flush, cpuid);
+	flush_data = raw_cpu_ptr(&deferred_flush);
 
 	/* Flush all CPUs' entries to avoid deferring too much.  If
 	 * this becomes a bottleneck, can just flush us, and rely on
@@ -3756,8 +3754,6 @@ static void add_unmap(struct dmar_domain
 	}
 	flush_data->size++;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&flush_data->lock, flags);
-
-	put_cpu();
 }
 
 static void intel_unmap(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr, size_t size)