blob: a75d42e4a735346ca2df5afc9bdfa0a593c78f0d [file] [log] [blame]
From 9f7486d87366cafcdd9c07e271acff52304ff474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:51:59 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] rose: fix info leak via msg_name in rose_recvmsg()
commit 4a184233f21645cf0b719366210ed445d1024d72 upstream.
The code in rose_recvmsg() does not initialize all of the members of
struct sockaddr_rose/full_sockaddr_rose when filling the sockaddr info.
Nor does it initialize the padding bytes of the structure inserted by
the compiler for alignment. This will lead to leaking uninitialized
kernel stack bytes in net/socket.c.
Fix the issue by initializing the memory used for sockaddr info with
memset(0).
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 547e5cd6d375..11072546d7e9 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -1277,6 +1277,7 @@ static int rose_recvmsg(struct kiocb *iocb, struct socket *sock,
skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, 0, msg->msg_iov, copied);
if (srose != NULL) {
+ memset(srose, 0, msg->msg_namelen);
srose->srose_family = AF_ROSE;
srose->srose_addr = rose->dest_addr;
srose->srose_call = rose->dest_call;
--
1.8.5.2