From f843ee6dd019bcece3e74e76ad9df0155655d0df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 07:45:44 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] xfrm_user: validate XFRM_MSG_NEWAE incoming ESN size harder

commit f843ee6dd019bcece3e74e76ad9df0155655d0df upstream.

Kees Cook has pointed out that xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() is subject to
wrapping issues.  To ensure we are correctly ensuring that the two ESN
structures are the same size compare both the overall size as reported
by xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() and the internal length are the same.

CVE-2017-7184
Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index cdf887fa61d5..40a8aa39220d 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -412,7 +412,11 @@ static inline int xfrm_replay_verify_len(struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_es
 	up = nla_data(rp);
 	ulen = xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(up);
 
-	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen || xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen)
+	/* Check the overall length and the internal bitmap length to avoid
+	 * potential overflow. */
+	if (nla_len(rp) < ulen ||
+	    xfrm_replay_state_esn_len(replay_esn) != ulen ||
+	    replay_esn->bmp_len != up->bmp_len)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (up->replay_window > up->bmp_len * sizeof(__u32) * 8)
-- 
2.12.0