release/5.2.42/gfs2-Do-log_flush-in-gfs2_ail_empty_gl-even-if-ail-l.patch

From 0d0cf502c79b2137ce2bbf79d2436c8d87a87faf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 13:47:02 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] gfs2: Do log_flush in gfs2_ail_empty_gl even if ail list is
 empty

commit 9ff78289356af640941bbb0dd3f46af2063f0046 upstream.

Before this patch, if gfs2_ail_empty_gl saw there was nothing on
the ail list, it would return and not flush the log. The problem
is that there could still be a revoke for the rgrp sitting on the
sd_log_le_revoke list that's been recently taken off the ail list.
But that revoke still needs to be written, and the rgrp_go_inval
still needs to call log_flush_wait to ensure the revokes are all
properly written to the journal before we relinquish control of
the glock to another node. If we give the glock to another node
before we have this knowledge, the node might crash and its journal
replayed, in which case the missing revoke would allow the journal
replay to replay the rgrp over top of the rgrp we already gave to
another node, thus overwriting its changes and corrupting the
file system.

This patch makes gfs2_ail_empty_gl still call gfs2_log_flush rather
than returning.

Signed-off-by: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glops.c b/fs/gfs2/glops.c
index cf4c767005b1..02cb8dc2d76a 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glops.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glops.c
@@ -89,8 +89,32 @@ static void gfs2_ail_empty_gl(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tr.tr_databuf);
 	tr.tr_revokes = atomic_read(&gl->gl_ail_count);
 
-	if (!tr.tr_revokes)
+	if (!tr.tr_revokes) {
+		bool have_revokes;
+		bool log_in_flight;
+
+		/*
+		 * We have nothing on the ail, but there could be revokes on
+		 * the sdp revoke queue, in which case, we still want to flush
+		 * the log and wait for it to finish.
+		 *
+		 * If the sdp revoke list is empty too, we might still have an
+		 * io outstanding for writing revokes, so we should wait for
+		 * it before returning.
+		 *
+		 * If none of these conditions are true, our revokes are all
+		 * flushed and we can return.
+		 */
+		gfs2_log_lock(sdp);
+		have_revokes = !list_empty(&sdp->sd_log_revokes);
+		log_in_flight = atomic_read(&sdp->sd_log_in_flight);
+		gfs2_log_unlock(sdp);
+		if (have_revokes)
+			goto flush;
+		if (log_in_flight)
+			log_flush_wait(sdp);
 		return;
+	}
 
 	/* A shortened, inline version of gfs2_trans_begin()
          * tr->alloced is not set since the transaction structure is
@@ -105,6 +129,7 @@ static void gfs2_ail_empty_gl(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
 	__gfs2_ail_flush(gl, 0, tr.tr_revokes);
 
 	gfs2_trans_end(sdp);
+flush:
 	gfs2_log_flush(sdp, NULL, GFS2_LOG_HEAD_FLUSH_NORMAL |
 		       GFS2_LFC_AIL_EMPTY_GL);
 }
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/log.c b/fs/gfs2/log.c
index d2a3bfdd350f..c2b238d1a9dd 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/log.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/log.c
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static void log_pull_tail(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, unsigned int new_tail)
 }
 
 
-static void log_flush_wait(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
+void log_flush_wait(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
 {
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/log.h b/fs/gfs2/log.h
index c762da494546..52b9bf27e918 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/log.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/log.h
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ extern void gfs2_log_flush(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_glock *gl,
 			   u32 type);
 extern void gfs2_log_commit(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct gfs2_trans *trans);
 extern void gfs2_ail1_flush(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp, struct writeback_control *wbc);
+extern void log_flush_wait(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp);
 
 extern void gfs2_log_shutdown(struct gfs2_sbd *sdp);
 extern int gfs2_logd(void *data);
-- 
2.7.4