)]}'
{
  "commit": "95c754d3f35d717d6fe44959c0331ca2556aa2ca",
  "tree": "9e88907a9257ae1650ca4089352191ca850757da",
  "parents": [
    "ecec32ba62bcdd59546b16d5a1a065bf0386ca7b"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "peterz@infradead.org",
    "time": "Fri Apr 04 10:15:15 2025 +0200"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "peterz@infradead.org",
    "time": "Fri Apr 18 17:47:29 2025 +0200"
  },
  "message": "sched/eevdf: Re-arrange current protection in pick_eevdf()\n\nThe way pick_eevdf() limits preemption is by explicitly picking\ncurrent if it is still eligible. It does this without consideration of\nthe best in-tree task.\n\nMove current protection to after the tree selection such that a follow\nup patch can change the conditions.\n\nShould be an semantics no-op at this point.\n\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) \u003cpeterz@infradead.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "6b835d7d5fe12acb7a2843b5fc5f9c838035447b",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "kernel/sched/fair.c",
      "new_id": "72f0ba56eb88d7142db21e578ccf5ffe822addfb",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "kernel/sched/fair.c"
    }
  ]
}