)]}'
{
  "commit": "afed220ac4aef6f840b46f835c4a3eb4035e2bb7",
  "tree": "61ae0ca6871f19a2c1a5e4b9e352da36b38c3978",
  "parents": [
    "93e81049ec669bc71bfe94cc20e26c0c47826763"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "peterz@infradead.org",
    "time": "Tue Nov 28 12:51:14 2023 +0100"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Peter Zijlstra",
    "email": "peterz@infradead.org",
    "time": "Fri Feb 07 12:53:20 2025 +0100"
  },
  "message": "x86/ibt: Clean up poison_endbr()\n\nBasically, get rid of the .warn argument and explicitly don\u0027t call the\nfunction when we know there isn\u0027t an endbr. This makes the calling\ncode clearer.\n\nNote: perhaps don\u0027t add functions to .cfi_sites when the function\ndoesn\u0027t have endbr -- OTOH why would the compiler emit the prefix if\nit has already determined there are no indirect callers and has\nomitted the ENDBR instruction.\n\nSigned-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) \u003cpeterz@infradead.org\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "fda11df1e650176296b5fbf1e59e4a96b3047bf0",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c",
      "new_id": "e285933506e991bf20a8c8d5dca0a26e92a0a63f",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c"
    }
  ]
}