queue-5.15/arm-9191-1-arm-stacktrace-kasan-silence-kasan-warnin.patch

From c76bc20a741e99f28caeed0679ef674bdee75a52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 10:52:47 +0100
Subject: ARM: 9191/1: arm/stacktrace, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in
 unwind_frame()

From: linyujun <linyujun809@huawei.com>

[ Upstream commit 9be4c88bb7924f68f88cfd47d925c2d046f51a73 ]

The following KASAN warning is detected by QEMU.

==================================================================
BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in unwind_frame+0x508/0x870
Read of size 4 at addr c36bba90 by task cat/163

CPU: 1 PID: 163 Comm: cat Not tainted 5.10.0-rc1 #40
Hardware name: ARM-Versatile Express
[<c0113fac>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010e71c>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[<c010e71c>] (show_stack) from [<c0b805b4>] (dump_stack+0x98/0xb0)
[<c0b805b4>] (dump_stack) from [<c0b7d658>] (print_address_description.constprop.0+0x58/0x4bc)
[<c0b7d658>] (print_address_description.constprop.0) from [<c031435c>] (kasan_report+0x154/0x170)
[<c031435c>] (kasan_report) from [<c0113c44>] (unwind_frame+0x508/0x870)
[<c0113c44>] (unwind_frame) from [<c010e298>] (__save_stack_trace+0x110/0x134)
[<c010e298>] (__save_stack_trace) from [<c01ce0d8>] (stack_trace_save+0x8c/0xb4)
[<c01ce0d8>] (stack_trace_save) from [<c0313520>] (kasan_set_track+0x38/0x60)
[<c0313520>] (kasan_set_track) from [<c0314cb8>] (kasan_set_free_info+0x20/0x2c)
[<c0314cb8>] (kasan_set_free_info) from [<c0313474>] (__kasan_slab_free+0xec/0x120)
[<c0313474>] (__kasan_slab_free) from [<c0311e20>] (kmem_cache_free+0x7c/0x334)
[<c0311e20>] (kmem_cache_free) from [<c01c35dc>] (rcu_core+0x390/0xccc)
[<c01c35dc>] (rcu_core) from [<c01013a8>] (__do_softirq+0x180/0x518)
[<c01013a8>] (__do_softirq) from [<c0135214>] (irq_exit+0x9c/0xe0)
[<c0135214>] (irq_exit) from [<c01a40e4>] (__handle_domain_irq+0xb0/0x110)
[<c01a40e4>] (__handle_domain_irq) from [<c0691248>] (gic_handle_irq+0xa0/0xb8)
[<c0691248>] (gic_handle_irq) from [<c0100b0c>] (__irq_svc+0x6c/0x94)
Exception stack(0xc36bb928 to 0xc36bb970)
b920:                   c36bb9c0 00000000 c0126919 c0101228 c36bb9c0 b76d7730
b940: c36b8000 c36bb9a0 c3335b00 c01ce0d8 00000003 c36bba3c c36bb940 c36bb978
b960: c010e298 c011373c 60000013 ffffffff
[<c0100b0c>] (__irq_svc) from [<c011373c>] (unwind_frame+0x0/0x870)
[<c011373c>] (unwind_frame) from [<00000000>] (0x0)

The buggy address belongs to the page:
page:(ptrval) refcount:0 mapcount:0 mapping:00000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x636bb
flags: 0x0()
raw: 00000000 00000000 ef867764 00000000 00000000 00000000 ffffffff 00000000
page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

addr c36bba90 is located in stack of task cat/163 at offset 48 in frame:
 stack_trace_save+0x0/0xb4

this frame has 1 object:
 [32, 48) 'trace'

Memory state around the buggy address:
 c36bb980: f1 f1 f1 f1 00 04 f2 f2 00 00 f3 f3 00 00 00 00
 c36bba00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
>c36bba80: 00 00 f3 f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
                 ^
 c36bbb00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
 c36bbb80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
==================================================================

There is a same issue on x86 and has been resolved by the commit f7d27c35ddff
("x86/mm, kasan: Silence KASAN warnings in get_wchan()").
The solution could be applied to arm architecture too.

Signed-off-by: Lin Yujun <linyujun809@huawei.com>
Reported-by: He Ying <heying24@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
index db798eac7431..824774999825 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -53,17 +53,17 @@ int notrace unwind_frame(struct stackframe *frame)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	frame->sp = frame->fp;
-	frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp);
-	frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp + 4);
+	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp));
+	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp + 4));
 #else
 	/* check current frame pointer is within bounds */
 	if (fp < low + 12 || fp > high - 4)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	/* restore the registers from the stack frame */
-	frame->fp = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 12);
-	frame->sp = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 8);
-	frame->pc = *(unsigned long *)(fp - 4);
+	frame->fp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 12));
+	frame->sp = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 8));
+	frame->pc = READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(*(unsigned long *)(fp - 4));
 #endif
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.35.1