Public-inbox for linux-sgx [shard-0]

Clone this repo:

Branches

  1. a81392d Re: [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX by Dr. Greg · 16 hours ago master
  2. 3775ddd RE: [RFC PATCH v4 10/12] security/selinux: Add enclave_load() implementation by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  3. 643cbed RE: [RFC PATCH v4 12/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Show line of sight to LSM support SGX2's EAUG by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  4. f4b768a RE: [RFC PATCH v4 08/12] security/selinux: Require SGX_MAPWX to map enclave page WX by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  5. eabc003 RE: [RFC PATCH v4 09/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  6. a737222 RE: [RFC PATCH v4 07/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_map() hook for Intel SGX by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  7. 3113bd6 RE: [RFC PATCH v4 04/12] x86/sgx: Require userspace to define enclave pages' protection bits by Xing, Cedric · 3 days ago
  8. ebaebed Re: [RFC PATCH v4 07/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_map() hook for Intel SGX by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  9. b7f8092 Re: [RFC PATCH v4 05/12] x86/sgx: Enforce noexec filesystem restriction for enclaves by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  10. b5ce9dc Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] security: x86/sgx: SGX vs. LSM by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  11. 10d069d Re: [RFC PATCH v4 06/12] mm: Introduce vm_ops->may_mprotect() by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  12. 8a84889 Re: [RFC PATCH v4 04/12] x86/sgx: Require userspace to define enclave pages' protection bits by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  13. 669825d Re: [RFC PATCH v4 04/12] x86/sgx: Require userspace to define enclave pages' protection bits by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  14. c3e2fed Re: [RFC PATCH v3 09/12] LSM: x86/sgx: Introduce ->enclave_load() hook for Intel SGX by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  15. 58f6bb2 Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/12] x86/sgx: Require userspace to define enclave pages' protection bits by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  16. 06a5f37 Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  17. a574c0d Re: [RFC PATCH v3 02/12] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address by Jarkko Sakkinen · 3 days ago
  18. f3e35e7 Re: [RFC PATCH v4 03/12] selftests: x86/sgx: Mark the enclave loader as not needing an exec stack by Jarkko Sakkinen · 4 days ago
  19. d7bf8cd Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/12] x86/sgx: Do not naturally align MAP_FIXED address by Jarkko Sakkinen · 4 days ago
  20. 2981071 Re: [RFC PATCH v4 01/12] x86/sgx: Use mmu_notifier.release() instead of per-vma refcounting by Jarkko Sakkinen · 4 days ago