blob: feea86d141a89b1bf21e5fdc1c5a6c04fc08f0f1 [file] [log] [blame]
From fc2f6de11ad98a998140b9bcb573c9c53bd9f969 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 12:10:11 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] fuse: verify all ioctl retry iov elements
commit fb6ccff667712c46b4501b920ea73a326e49626a upstream.
Commit 7572777eef78ebdee1ecb7c258c0ef94d35bad16 attempted to verify that
the total iovec from the client doesn't overflow iov_length() but it
only checked the first element. The iovec could still overflow by
starting with a small element. The obvious fix is to check all the
elements.
The overflow case doesn't look dangerous to the kernel as the copy is
limited by the length after the overflow. This fix restores the
intention of returning an error instead of successfully copying less
than the iovec represented.
I found this by code inspection. I built it but don't have a test case.
I'm cc:ing stable because the initial commit did as well.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
fs/fuse/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index f6104a958812..102d58297174 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static int fuse_verify_ioctl_iov(struct iovec *iov, size_t count)
size_t n;
u32 max = FUSE_MAX_PAGES_PER_REQ << PAGE_SHIFT;
- for (n = 0; n < count; n++) {
+ for (n = 0; n < count; n++, iov++) {
if (iov->iov_len > (size_t) max)
return -ENOMEM;
max -= iov->iov_len;
--
1.8.5.2