blob: 0914c8afe37b56a367c0d81c238cceaa58c964a9 [file] [log] [blame]
From 3defb2476166445982a90c12d33f8947e75476c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Va=C5=A1ut?= <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 23:53:09 +0100
Subject: ARM: 6146/1: sa1111: Prevent deadlock in resume path
From: =?UTF-8?q?Marek=20Va=C5=A1ut?= <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
commit 3defb2476166445982a90c12d33f8947e75476c4 upstream.
This patch reorganises the sa1111_resume() function in a manner the spinlock
happens after calling the sa1111_wake(). This fixes two bugs:
1) This function called sa1111_wake() which tried to claim the same spinlock
the sa1111_resume() already claimed. This would result in certain deadlock.
Original idea for this part: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2) The function didn't unlock the spinlock in case the chip didn't report
correct ID.
Original idea for this part: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
arch/arm/common/sa1111.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/sa1111.c
@@ -887,8 +887,6 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
if (!save)
return 0;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sachip->lock, flags);
-
/*
* Ensure that the SA1111 is still here.
* FIXME: shouldn't do this here.
@@ -905,6 +903,13 @@ static int sa1111_resume(struct platform
* First of all, wake up the chip.
*/
sa1111_wake(sachip);
+
+ /*
+ * Only lock for write ops. Also, sa1111_wake must be called with
+ * released spinlock!
+ */
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&sachip->lock, flags);
+
sa1111_writel(0, sachip->base + SA1111_INTC + SA1111_INTEN0);
sa1111_writel(0, sachip->base + SA1111_INTC + SA1111_INTEN1);