blob: 1614087bf028808a94b1f0245452293c69a9b645 [file] [log] [blame]
[[Reference_Count_Btree]]
== Reference Count B+tree
[NOTE]
This data structure is under construction! Details may change.
To support the sharing of file data blocks (reflink), each allocation group has
its own reference count B+tree, which grows in the allocated space like the
inode B+trees. This data could be collected by performing an interval query of
the reverse-mapping B+tree, but doing so would come at a huge performance
penalty. Therefore, this data structure is a cache of computable information.
This B+tree is only present if the +XFS_SB_FEAT_RO_COMPAT_REFLINK+
feature is enabled. The feature requires a version 5 filesystem.
Each record in the reference count B+tree has the following structure:
[source, c]
----
struct xfs_refcount_rec {
__be32 rc_startblock;
__be32 rc_blockcount;
__be32 rc_refcount;
};
----
*rc_startblock*::
AG block number of this record. The high bit is set for all records
referring to an extent that is being used to stage a copy on write
operation. This reduces recovery time during mount operations. The
reference count of these staging events must only be 1.
*rc_blockcount*::
The length of this extent.
*rc_refcount*::
Number of mappings of this filesystem extent.
Node pointers are an AG relative block pointer:
[source, c]
----
struct xfs_refcount_key {
__be32 rc_startblock;
};
----
* As the reference counting is AG relative, all the block numbers are only
32-bits.
* The +bb_magic+ value is "R3FC" (0x52334643).
* The +xfs_btree_sblock_t+ header is used for intermediate B+tree node as well
as the leaves.
=== xfs_db refcntbt Example
For this example, an XFS filesystem was populated with a root filesystem and
a deduplication program was run to create shared blocks:
----
xfs_db> agf 0
xfs_db> addr refcntroot
xfs_db> p
magic = 0x52334643
level = 1
numrecs = 6
leftsib = null
rightsib = null
bno = 36892
lsn = 0x200004ec2
uuid = f1f89746-e00b-49c9-96b3-ecef0f2f14ae
owner = 0
crc = 0x75f35128 (correct)
keys[1-6] = [startblock] 1:[14] 2:[65633] 3:[65780] 4:[94571] 5:[117201] 6:[152442]
ptrs[1-6] = 1:7 2:25836 3:25835 4:18447 5:18445 6:18449
xfs_db> addr ptrs[3]
xfs_db> p
magic = 0x52334643
level = 0
numrecs = 80
leftsib = 25836
rightsib = 18447
bno = 51670
lsn = 0x200004ec2
uuid = f1f89746-e00b-49c9-96b3-ecef0f2f14ae
owner = 0
crc = 0xc3962813 (correct)
recs[1-80] = [startblock,blockcount,refcount,cowflag]
1:[65780,1,2,0] 2:[65781,1,3,0] 3:[65785,2,2,0] 4:[66640,1,2,0]
5:[69602,4,2,0] 6:[72256,16,2,0] 7:[72871,4,2,0] 8:[72879,20,2,0]
9:[73395,4,2,0] 10:[75063,4,2,0] 11:[79093,4,2,0] 12:[86344,16,2,0]
...
80:[35235,10,1,1]
----
Notice record 80. The copy on write flag is set and the reference count is
1, which indicates that the extent 35,235 - 35,244 are being used to stage a
copy on write activity. The "cowflag" field is the high bit of rc_startblock.
Record 6 in the reference count B+tree for AG 0 indicates that the AG extent
starting at block 72,256 and running for 16 blocks has a reference count of 2.
This means that there are two files sharing the block:
----
xfs_db> blockget -n
xfs_db> fsblock 72256
xfs_db> blockuse
block 72256 (0/72256) type rldata inode 25169197
----
The blockuse type changes to ``rldata'' to indicate that the block is shared
data. Unfortunately, blockuse only tells us about one block owner. If we
happen to have enabled the reverse-mapping B+tree, we can use it to find all
inodes that own this block:
----
xfs_db> agf 0
xfs_db> addr rmaproot
...
xfs_db> addr ptrs[3]
...
xfs_db> addr ptrs[7]
xfs_db> p
magic = 0x524d4233
level = 0
numrecs = 22
leftsib = 65057
rightsib = 65058
bno = 291478
lsn = 0x200004ec2
uuid = f1f89746-e00b-49c9-96b3-ecef0f2f14ae
owner = 0
crc = 0xed7da3f7 (correct)
recs[1-22] = [startblock,blockcount,owner,offset,extentflag,attrfork,bmbtblock]
1:[68957,8,3201,0,0,0,0] 2:[68965,4,25260953,0,0,0,0]
...
18:[72232,58,3227,0,0,0,0] 19:[72256,16,25169197,24,0,0,0]
20:[72290,75,3228,0,0,0,0] 21:[72365,46,3229,0,0,0,0]
----
Records 18 and 19 intersect the block 72,256; they tell us that inodes 3,227
and 25,169,197 both claim ownership. Let us confirm this:
----
xfs_db> inode 25169197
xfs_db> bmap
data offset 0 startblock 12632259 (3/49347) count 24 flag 0
data offset 24 startblock 72256 (0/72256) count 16 flag 0
data offset 40 startblock 12632299 (3/49387) count 18 flag 0
xfs_db> inode 3227
xfs_db> bmap
data offset 0 startblock 72232 (0/72232) count 58 flag 0
----
Inodes 25,169,197 and 3,227 both contain mappings to block 0/72,256.