patches/old/mm-shmem-handle-uffd-wp-during-fork.patch

From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Subject: mm/shmem: handle uffd-wp during fork()

Normally we skip copy page when fork() for VM_SHARED shmem, but we can't
skip it anymore if uffd-wp is enabled on dst vma.  This should only happen
when the src uffd has UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK enabled on uffd-wp shmem
vma, so that VM_UFFD_WP will be propagated onto dst vma too, then we
should copy the pgtables with uffd-wp bit and pte markers, because these
information will be lost otherwise.

Since the condition checks will become even more complicated for deciding
"whether a vma needs to copy the pgtable during fork()", introduce a
helper vma_needs_copy() for it, so everything will be clearer.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014855.14468-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 mm/memory.c |   49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/memory.c~mm-shmem-handle-uffd-wp-during-fork
+++ a/mm/memory.c
@@ -867,6 +867,14 @@ copy_nonpresent_pte(struct mm_struct *ds
 		if (try_restore_exclusive_pte(src_pte, src_vma, addr))
 			return -EBUSY;
 		return -ENOENT;
+	} else if (is_pte_marker_entry(entry)) {
+		/*
+		 * We're copying the pgtable should only because dst_vma has
+		 * uffd-wp enabled, do sanity check.
+		 */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(!userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma));
+		set_pte_at(dst_mm, addr, dst_pte, pte);
+		return 0;
 	}
 	if (!userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
 		pte = pte_swp_clear_uffd_wp(pte);
@@ -1221,6 +1229,38 @@ copy_p4d_range(struct vm_area_struct *ds
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return true if the vma needs to copy the pgtable during this fork().  Return
+ * false when we can speed up fork() by allowing lazy page faults later until
+ * when the child accesses the memory range.
+ */
+bool
+vma_needs_copy(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Always copy pgtables when dst_vma has uffd-wp enabled even if it's
+	 * file-backed (e.g. shmem). Because when uffd-wp is enabled, pgtable
+	 * contains uffd-wp protection information, that's something we can't
+	 * retrieve from page cache, and skip copying will lose those info.
+	 */
+	if (userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma))
+		return true;
+
+	if (src_vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP))
+		return true;
+
+	if (src_vma->anon_vma)
+		return true;
+
+	/*
+	 * Don't copy ptes where a page fault will fill them correctly.  Fork
+	 * becomes much lighter when there are big shared or private readonly
+	 * mappings. The tradeoff is that copy_page_range is more efficient
+	 * than faulting.
+	 */
+	return false;
+}
+
 int
 copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
 {
@@ -1234,14 +1274,7 @@ copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *d
 	bool is_cow;
 	int ret;
 
-	/*
-	 * Don't copy ptes where a page fault will fill them correctly.
-	 * Fork becomes much lighter when there are big shared or private
-	 * readonly mappings. The tradeoff is that copy_page_range is more
-	 * efficient than faulting.
-	 */
-	if (!(src_vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGETLB | VM_PFNMAP | VM_MIXEDMAP)) &&
-	    !src_vma->anon_vma)
+	if (!vma_needs_copy(dst_vma, src_vma))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(src_vma))
_