blob: def1a9b8ae925452cfe74b48a5f8a8a02cdc9832 [file] [log] [blame]
From: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
Subject: mm/vmalloc: fix a comment
The sentence
"but the mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving"
should be rephrased with
"but the mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving"
where "mempolicy" is a struct name.
This work is coauthored by
Yinan Zhang
Jiajian Ye
Shenghong Han
Chongxi Zhao
Yuhong Feng
Yongqiang Liu
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401064543.4447-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn
Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-fix-a-comment
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2895,7 +2895,7 @@ vm_area_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp, int nid,
/* memory allocation should consider mempolicy, we can't
* wrongly use nearest node when nid == NUMA_NO_NODE,
* otherwise memory may be allocated in only one node,
- * but mempolcy want to alloc memory by interleaving.
+ * but mempolicy wants to alloc memory by interleaving.
*/
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA) && nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
nr = alloc_pages_bulk_array_mempolicy(bulk_gfp,
_