|  | =================== | 
|  | Firmware Guidelines | 
|  | =================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | Users switching to a newer kernel should *not* have to install newer | 
|  | firmware files to keep their hardware working. At the same time updated | 
|  | firmware files must not cause any regressions for users of older kernel | 
|  | releases. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Drivers that use firmware from linux-firmware should follow the rules in | 
|  | this guide. (Where there is limited control of the firmware, | 
|  | i.e. company doesn't support Linux, firmwares sourced from misc places, | 
|  | then of course these rules will not apply strictly.) | 
|  |  | 
|  | * Firmware files shall be designed in a way that it allows checking for | 
|  | firmware ABI version changes. It is recommended that firmware files be | 
|  | versioned with at least a major/minor version. It is suggested that | 
|  | the firmware files in linux-firmware be named with some device | 
|  | specific name, and just the major version. The firmware version should | 
|  | be stored in the firmware header, or as an exception, as part of the | 
|  | firmware file name, in order to let the driver detact any non-ABI | 
|  | fixes/changes. The firmware files in linux-firmware should be | 
|  | overwritten with the newest compatible major version. Newer major | 
|  | version firmware shall remain compatible with all kernels that load | 
|  | that major number. | 
|  |  | 
|  | * If the kernel support for the hardware is normally inactive, or the | 
|  | hardware isn't available for public consumption, this can | 
|  | be ignored, until the first kernel release that enables that hardware. | 
|  | This means no major version bumps without the kernel retaining | 
|  | backwards compatibility for the older major versions.  Minor version | 
|  | bumps should not introduce new features that newer kernels depend on | 
|  | non-optionally. | 
|  |  | 
|  | * If a security fix needs lockstep firmware and kernel fixes in order to | 
|  | be successful, then all supported major versions in the linux-firmware | 
|  | repo that are required by currently supported stable/LTS kernels, | 
|  | should be updated with the security fix. The kernel patches should | 
|  | detect if the firmware is new enough to declare if the security issue | 
|  | is fixed.  All communications around security fixes should point at | 
|  | both the firmware and kernel fixes. If a security fix requires | 
|  | deprecating old major versions, then this should only be done as a | 
|  | last option, and be stated clearly in all communications. | 
|  |  |