| ================================== |
| RT-mutex subsystem with PI support |
| ================================== |
| |
| RT-mutexes with priority inheritance are used to support PI-futexes, |
| which enable pthread_mutex_t priority inheritance attributes |
| (PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT). [See Documentation/locking/pi-futex.rst for more details |
| about PI-futexes.] |
| |
| This technology was developed in the -rt tree and streamlined for |
| pthread_mutex support. |
| |
| Basic principles: |
| ----------------- |
| |
| RT-mutexes extend the semantics of simple mutexes by the priority |
| inheritance protocol. |
| |
| A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher |
| priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily |
| boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority |
| boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The |
| priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been |
| unlocked. |
| |
| This approach allows us to shorten the block of high-prio tasks on |
| mutexes which protect shared resources. Priority inheritance is not a |
| magic bullet for poorly designed applications, but it allows |
| well-designed applications to use userspace locks in critical parts of |
| an high priority thread, without losing determinism. |
| |
| The enqueueing of the waiters into the rtmutex waiter tree is done in |
| priority order. For same priorities FIFO order is chosen. For each |
| rtmutex, only the top priority waiter is enqueued into the owner's |
| priority waiters tree. This tree too queues in priority order. Whenever |
| the top priority waiter of a task changes (for example it timed out or |
| got a signal), the priority of the owner task is readjusted. The |
| priority enqueueing is handled by "pi_waiters". |
| |
| RT-mutexes are optimized for fastpath operations and have no internal |
| locking overhead when locking an uncontended mutex or unlocking a mutex |
| without waiters. The optimized fastpath operations require cmpxchg |
| support. [If that is not available then the rt-mutex internal spinlock |
| is used] |
| |
| The state of the rt-mutex is tracked via the owner field of the rt-mutex |
| structure: |
| |
| lock->owner holds the task_struct pointer of the owner. Bit 0 is used to |
| keep track of the "lock has waiters" state: |
| |
| ============ ======= ================================================ |
| owner bit0 Notes |
| ============ ======= ================================================ |
| NULL 0 lock is free (fast acquire possible) |
| NULL 1 lock is free and has waiters and the top waiter |
| is going to take the lock [1]_ |
| taskpointer 0 lock is held (fast release possible) |
| taskpointer 1 lock is held and has waiters [2]_ |
| ============ ======= ================================================ |
| |
| The fast atomic compare exchange based acquire and release is only |
| possible when bit 0 of lock->owner is 0. |
| |
| .. [1] It also can be a transitional state when grabbing the lock |
| with ->wait_lock is held. To prevent any fast path cmpxchg to the lock, |
| we need to set the bit0 before looking at the lock, and the owner may |
| be NULL in this small time, hence this can be a transitional state. |
| |
| .. [2] There is a small time when bit 0 is set but there are no |
| waiters. This can happen when grabbing the lock in the slow path. |
| To prevent a cmpxchg of the owner releasing the lock, we need to |
| set this bit before looking at the lock. |
| |
| BTW, there is still technically a "Pending Owner", it's just not called |
| that anymore. The pending owner happens to be the top_waiter of a lock |
| that has no owner and has been woken up to grab the lock. |