|  | ============ | 
|  | Introduction | 
|  | ============ | 
|  |  | 
|  | The Linux DRM layer contains code intended to support the needs of | 
|  | complex graphics devices, usually containing programmable pipelines well | 
|  | suited to 3D graphics acceleration. Graphics drivers in the kernel may | 
|  | make use of DRM functions to make tasks like memory management, | 
|  | interrupt handling and DMA easier, and provide a uniform interface to | 
|  | applications. | 
|  |  | 
|  | A note on versions: this guide covers features found in the DRM tree, | 
|  | including the TTM memory manager, output configuration and mode setting, | 
|  | and the new vblank internals, in addition to all the regular features | 
|  | found in current kernels. | 
|  |  | 
|  | [Insert diagram of typical DRM stack here] | 
|  |  | 
|  | Style Guidelines | 
|  | ================ | 
|  |  | 
|  | For consistency this documentation uses American English. Abbreviations | 
|  | are written as all-uppercase, for example: DRM, KMS, IOCTL, CRTC, and so | 
|  | on. To aid in reading, documentations make full use of the markup | 
|  | characters kerneldoc provides: @parameter for function parameters, | 
|  | @member for structure members (within the same structure), &struct structure to | 
|  | reference structures and function() for functions. These all get automatically | 
|  | hyperlinked if kerneldoc for the referenced objects exists. When referencing | 
|  | entries in function vtables (and structure members in general) please use | 
|  | &vtable_name.vfunc. Unfortunately this does not yet yield a direct link to the | 
|  | member, only the structure. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Except in special situations (to separate locked from unlocked variants) | 
|  | locking requirements for functions aren't documented in the kerneldoc. | 
|  | Instead locking should be check at runtime using e.g. | 
|  | ``WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(...));``. Since it's much easier to ignore | 
|  | documentation than runtime noise this provides more value. And on top of | 
|  | that runtime checks do need to be updated when the locking rules change, | 
|  | increasing the chances that they're correct. Within the documentation | 
|  | the locking rules should be explained in the relevant structures: Either | 
|  | in the comment for the lock explaining what it protects, or data fields | 
|  | need a note about which lock protects them, or both. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Functions which have a non-\ ``void`` return value should have a section | 
|  | called "Returns" explaining the expected return values in different | 
|  | cases and their meanings. Currently there's no consensus whether that | 
|  | section name should be all upper-case or not, and whether it should end | 
|  | in a colon or not. Go with the file-local style. Other common section | 
|  | names are "Notes" with information for dangerous or tricky corner cases, | 
|  | and "FIXME" where the interface could be cleaned up. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Also read the :ref:`guidelines for the kernel documentation at large <doc_guide>`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Documentation Requirements for kAPI | 
|  | ----------------------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | All kernel APIs exported to other modules must be documented, including their | 
|  | datastructures and at least a short introductory section explaining the overall | 
|  | concepts. Documentation should be put into the code itself as kerneldoc comments | 
|  | as much as reasonable. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Do not blindly document everything, but document only what's relevant for driver | 
|  | authors: Internal functions of drm.ko and definitely static functions should not | 
|  | have formal kerneldoc comments. Use normal C comments if you feel like a comment | 
|  | is warranted. You may use kerneldoc syntax in the comment, but it shall not | 
|  | start with a /** kerneldoc marker. Similar for data structures, annotate | 
|  | anything entirely private with ``/* private: */`` comments as per the | 
|  | documentation guide. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Getting Started | 
|  | =============== | 
|  |  | 
|  | Developers interested in helping out with the DRM subsystem are very welcome. | 
|  | Often people will resort to sending in patches for various issues reported by | 
|  | checkpatch or sparse. We welcome such contributions. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Anyone looking to kick it up a notch can find a list of janitorial tasks on | 
|  | the :ref:`TODO list <todo>`. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Contribution Process | 
|  | ==================== | 
|  |  | 
|  | Mostly the DRM subsystem works like any other kernel subsystem, see :ref:`the | 
|  | main process guidelines and documentation <process_index>` for how things work. | 
|  | Here we just document some of the specialities of the GPU subsystem. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Feature Merge Deadlines | 
|  | ----------------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | All feature work must be in the linux-next tree by the -rc6 release of the | 
|  | current release cycle, otherwise they must be postponed and can't reach the next | 
|  | merge window. All patches must have landed in the drm-next tree by latest -rc7, | 
|  | but if your branch is not in linux-next then this must have happened by -rc6 | 
|  | already. | 
|  |  | 
|  | After that point only bugfixes (like after the upstream merge window has closed | 
|  | with the -rc1 release) are allowed. No new platform enabling or new drivers are | 
|  | allowed. | 
|  |  | 
|  | This means that there's a blackout-period of about one month where feature work | 
|  | can't be merged. The recommended way to deal with that is having a -next tree | 
|  | that's always open, but making sure to not feed it into linux-next during the | 
|  | blackout period. As an example, drm-misc works like that. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Code of Conduct | 
|  | --------------- | 
|  |  | 
|  | As a freedesktop.org project, dri-devel, and the DRM community, follows the | 
|  | Contributor Covenant, found at: https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct | 
|  |  | 
|  | Please conduct yourself in a respectful and civilised manner when | 
|  | interacting with community members on mailing lists, IRC, or bug | 
|  | trackers. The community represents the project as a whole, and abusive | 
|  | or bullying behaviour is not tolerated by the project. |