| =============== | 
 | Pathname lookup | 
 | =============== | 
 |  | 
 | This write-up is based on three articles published at lwn.net: | 
 |  | 
 | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649115/> Pathname lookup in Linux | 
 | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/649729/> RCU-walk: faster pathname lookup in Linux | 
 | - <https://lwn.net/Articles/650786/> A walk among the symlinks | 
 |  | 
 | Written by Neil Brown with help from Al Viro and Jon Corbet. | 
 | It has subsequently been updated to reflect changes in the kernel | 
 | including: | 
 |  | 
 | - per-directory parallel name lookup. | 
 | - ``openat2()`` resolution restriction flags. | 
 |  | 
 | Introduction to pathname lookup | 
 | =============================== | 
 |  | 
 | The most obvious aspect of pathname lookup, which very little | 
 | exploration is needed to discover, is that it is complex.  There are | 
 | many rules, special cases, and implementation alternatives that all | 
 | combine to confuse the unwary reader.  Computer science has long been | 
 | acquainted with such complexity and has tools to help manage it.  One | 
 | tool that we will make extensive use of is "divide and conquer".  For | 
 | the early parts of the analysis we will divide off symlinks - leaving | 
 | them until the final part.  Well before we get to symlinks we have | 
 | another major division based on the VFS's approach to locking which | 
 | will allow us to review "REF-walk" and "RCU-walk" separately.  But we | 
 | are getting ahead of ourselves.  There are some important low level | 
 | distinctions we need to clarify first. | 
 |  | 
 | There are two sorts of ... | 
 | -------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | .. _openat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/openat.2.html | 
 |  | 
 | Pathnames (sometimes "file names"), used to identify objects in the | 
 | filesystem, will be familiar to most readers.  They contain two sorts | 
 | of elements: "slashes" that are sequences of one or more "``/``" | 
 | characters, and "components" that are sequences of one or more | 
 | non-"``/``" characters.  These form two kinds of paths.  Those that | 
 | start with slashes are "absolute" and start from the filesystem root. | 
 | The others are "relative" and start from the current directory, or | 
 | from some other location specified by a file descriptor given to | 
 | "``*at()``" system calls such as `openat() <openat_>`_. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _execveat: http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execveat.2.html | 
 |  | 
 | It is tempting to describe the second kind as starting with a | 
 | component, but that isn't always accurate: a pathname can lack both | 
 | slashes and components, it can be empty, in other words.  This is | 
 | generally forbidden in POSIX, but some of those "``*at()``" system calls | 
 | in Linux permit it when the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag is given.  For | 
 | example, if you have an open file descriptor on an executable file you | 
 | can execute it by calling `execveat() <execveat_>`_ passing | 
 | the file descriptor, an empty path, and the ``AT_EMPTY_PATH`` flag. | 
 |  | 
 | These paths can be divided into two sections: the final component and | 
 | everything else.  The "everything else" is the easy bit.  In all cases | 
 | it must identify a directory that already exists, otherwise an error | 
 | such as ``ENOENT`` or ``ENOTDIR`` will be reported. | 
 |  | 
 | The final component is not so simple.  Not only do different system | 
 | calls interpret it quite differently (e.g. some create it, some do | 
 | not), but it might not even exist: neither the empty pathname nor the | 
 | pathname that is just slashes have a final component.  If it does | 
 | exist, it could be "``.``" or "``..``" which are handled quite differently | 
 | from other components. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _POSIX: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_12 | 
 |  | 
 | If a pathname ends with a slash, such as "``/tmp/foo/``" it might be | 
 | tempting to consider that to have an empty final component.  In many | 
 | ways that would lead to correct results, but not always.  In | 
 | particular, ``mkdir()`` and ``rmdir()`` each create or remove a directory named | 
 | by the final component, and they are required to work with pathnames | 
 | ending in "``/``".  According to POSIX_: | 
 |  | 
 |   A pathname that contains at least one non-<slash> character and | 
 |   that ends with one or more trailing <slash> characters shall not | 
 |   be resolved successfully unless the last pathname component before | 
 |   the trailing <slash> characters names an existing directory or a | 
 |   directory entry that is to be created for a directory immediately | 
 |   after the pathname is resolved. | 
 |  | 
 | The Linux pathname walking code (mostly in ``fs/namei.c``) deals with | 
 | all of these issues: breaking the path into components, handling the | 
 | "everything else" quite separately from the final component, and | 
 | checking that the trailing slash is not used where it isn't | 
 | permitted.  It also addresses the important issue of concurrent | 
 | access. | 
 |  | 
 | While one process is looking up a pathname, another might be making | 
 | changes that affect that lookup.  One fairly extreme case is that if | 
 | "a/b" were renamed to "a/c/b" while another process were looking up | 
 | "a/b/..", that process might successfully resolve on "a/c". | 
 | Most races are much more subtle, and a big part of the task of | 
 | pathname lookup is to prevent them from having damaging effects.  Many | 
 | of the possible races are seen most clearly in the context of the | 
 | "dcache" and an understanding of that is central to understanding | 
 | pathname lookup. | 
 |  | 
 | More than just a cache | 
 | ---------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | The "dcache" caches information about names in each filesystem to | 
 | make them quickly available for lookup.  Each entry (known as a | 
 | "dentry") contains three significant fields: a component name, a | 
 | pointer to a parent dentry, and a pointer to the "inode" which | 
 | contains further information about the object in that parent with | 
 | the given name.  The inode pointer can be ``NULL`` indicating that the | 
 | name doesn't exist in the parent.  While there can be linkage in the | 
 | dentry of a directory to the dentries of the children, that linkage is | 
 | not used for pathname lookup, and so will not be considered here. | 
 |  | 
 | The dcache has a number of uses apart from accelerating lookup.  One | 
 | that will be particularly relevant is that it is closely integrated | 
 | with the mount table that records which filesystem is mounted where. | 
 | What the mount table actually stores is which dentry is mounted on top | 
 | of which other dentry. | 
 |  | 
 | When considering the dcache, we have another of our "two types" | 
 | distinctions: there are two types of filesystems. | 
 |  | 
 | Some filesystems ensure that the information in the dcache is always | 
 | completely accurate (though not necessarily complete).  This can allow | 
 | the VFS to determine if a particular file does or doesn't exist | 
 | without checking with the filesystem, and means that the VFS can | 
 | protect the filesystem against certain races and other problems. | 
 | These are typically "local" filesystems such as ext3, XFS, and Btrfs. | 
 |  | 
 | Other filesystems don't provide that guarantee because they cannot. | 
 | These are typically filesystems that are shared across a network, | 
 | whether remote filesystems like NFS and 9P, or cluster filesystems | 
 | like ocfs2 or cephfs.  These filesystems allow the VFS to revalidate | 
 | cached information, and must provide their own protection against | 
 | awkward races.  The VFS can detect these filesystems by the | 
 | ``DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE`` flag being set in the dentry. | 
 |  | 
 | REF-walk: simple concurrency management with refcounts and spinlocks | 
 | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | With all of those divisions carefully classified, we can now start | 
 | looking at the actual process of walking along a path.  In particular | 
 | we will start with the handling of the "everything else" part of a | 
 | pathname, and focus on the "REF-walk" approach to concurrency | 
 | management.  This code is found in the ``link_path_walk()`` function, if | 
 | you ignore all the places that only run when "``LOOKUP_RCU``" | 
 | (indicating the use of RCU-walk) is set. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Meet the Lockers: https://lwn.net/Articles/453685/ | 
 |  | 
 | REF-walk is fairly heavy-handed with locks and reference counts.  Not | 
 | as heavy-handed as in the old "big kernel lock" days, but certainly not | 
 | afraid of taking a lock when one is needed.  It uses a variety of | 
 | different concurrency controls.  A background understanding of the | 
 | various primitives is assumed, or can be gleaned from elsewhere such | 
 | as in `Meet the Lockers`_. | 
 |  | 
 | The locking mechanisms used by REF-walk include: | 
 |  | 
 | dentry->d_lockref | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | This uses the lockref primitive to provide both a spinlock and a | 
 | reference count.  The special-sauce of this primitive is that the | 
 | conceptual sequence "lock; inc_ref; unlock;" can often be performed | 
 | with a single atomic memory operation. | 
 |  | 
 | Holding a reference on a dentry ensures that the dentry won't suddenly | 
 | be freed and used for something else, so the values in various fields | 
 | will behave as expected.  It also protects the ``->d_inode`` reference | 
 | to the inode to some extent. | 
 |  | 
 | The association between a dentry and its inode is fairly permanent. | 
 | For example, when a file is renamed, the dentry and inode move | 
 | together to the new location.  When a file is created the dentry will | 
 | initially be negative (i.e. ``d_inode`` is ``NULL``), and will be assigned | 
 | to the new inode as part of the act of creation. | 
 |  | 
 | When a file is deleted, this can be reflected in the cache either by | 
 | setting ``d_inode`` to ``NULL``, or by removing it from the hash table | 
 | (described shortly) used to look up the name in the parent directory. | 
 | If the dentry is still in use the second option is used as it is | 
 | perfectly legal to keep using an open file after it has been deleted | 
 | and having the dentry around helps.  If the dentry is not otherwise in | 
 | use (i.e. if the refcount in ``d_lockref`` is one), only then will | 
 | ``d_inode`` be set to ``NULL``.  Doing it this way is more efficient for a | 
 | very common case. | 
 |  | 
 | So as long as a counted reference is held to a dentry, a non-``NULL`` ``->d_inode`` | 
 | value will never be changed. | 
 |  | 
 | dentry->d_lock | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | ``d_lock`` is a synonym for the spinlock that is part of ``d_lockref`` above. | 
 | For our purposes, holding this lock protects against the dentry being | 
 | renamed or unlinked.  In particular, its parent (``d_parent``), and its | 
 | name (``d_name``) cannot be changed, and it cannot be removed from the | 
 | dentry hash table. | 
 |  | 
 | When looking for a name in a directory, REF-walk takes ``d_lock`` on | 
 | each candidate dentry that it finds in the hash table and then checks | 
 | that the parent and name are correct.  So it doesn't lock the parent | 
 | while searching in the cache; it only locks children. | 
 |  | 
 | When looking for the parent for a given name (to handle "``..``"), | 
 | REF-walk can take ``d_lock`` to get a stable reference to ``d_parent``, | 
 | but it first tries a more lightweight approach.  As seen in | 
 | ``dget_parent()``, if a reference can be claimed on the parent, and if | 
 | subsequently ``d_parent`` can be seen to have not changed, then there is | 
 | no need to actually take the lock on the child. | 
 |  | 
 | rename_lock | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Looking up a given name in a given directory involves computing a hash | 
 | from the two values (the name and the dentry of the directory), | 
 | accessing that slot in a hash table, and searching the linked list | 
 | that is found there. | 
 |  | 
 | When a dentry is renamed, the name and the parent dentry can both | 
 | change so the hash will almost certainly change too.  This would move the | 
 | dentry to a different chain in the hash table.  If a filename search | 
 | happened to be looking at a dentry that was moved in this way, | 
 | it might end up continuing the search down the wrong chain, | 
 | and so miss out on part of the correct chain. | 
 |  | 
 | The name-lookup process (``d_lookup()``) does *not* try to prevent this | 
 | from happening, but only to detect when it happens. | 
 | ``rename_lock`` is a seqlock that is updated whenever any dentry is | 
 | renamed.  If ``d_lookup`` finds that a rename happened while it | 
 | unsuccessfully scanned a chain in the hash table, it simply tries | 
 | again. | 
 |  | 
 | ``rename_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks | 
 | against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where | 
 | the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` | 
 | check). If ``rename_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters | 
 | a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with | 
 | ``-EAGAIN``. | 
 |  | 
 | inode->i_rwsem | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | ``i_rwsem`` is a read/write semaphore that serializes all changes to a particular | 
 | directory.  This ensures that, for example, an ``unlink()`` and a ``rename()`` | 
 | cannot both happen at the same time.  It also keeps the directory | 
 | stable while the filesystem is asked to look up a name that is not | 
 | currently in the dcache or, optionally, when the list of entries in a | 
 | directory is being retrieved with ``readdir()``. | 
 |  | 
 | This has a complementary role to that of ``d_lock``: ``i_rwsem`` on a | 
 | directory protects all of the names in that directory, while ``d_lock`` | 
 | on a name protects just one name in a directory.  Most changes to the | 
 | dcache hold ``i_rwsem`` on the relevant directory inode and briefly take | 
 | ``d_lock`` on one or more the dentries while the change happens.  One | 
 | exception is when idle dentries are removed from the dcache due to | 
 | memory pressure.  This uses ``d_lock``, but ``i_rwsem`` plays no role. | 
 |  | 
 | The semaphore affects pathname lookup in two distinct ways.  Firstly it | 
 | prevents changes during lookup of a name in a directory.  ``walk_component()`` uses | 
 | ``lookup_fast()`` first which, in turn, checks to see if the name is in the cache, | 
 | using only ``d_lock`` locking.  If the name isn't found, then ``walk_component()`` | 
 | falls back to ``lookup_slow()`` which takes a shared lock on ``i_rwsem``, checks again that | 
 | the name isn't in the cache, and then calls in to the filesystem to get a | 
 | definitive answer.  A new dentry will be added to the cache regardless of | 
 | the result. | 
 |  | 
 | Secondly, when pathname lookup reaches the final component, it will | 
 | sometimes need to take an exclusive lock on ``i_rwsem`` before performing the last lookup so | 
 | that the required exclusion can be achieved.  How path lookup chooses | 
 | to take, or not take, ``i_rwsem`` is one of the | 
 | issues addressed in a subsequent section. | 
 |  | 
 | If two threads attempt to look up the same name at the same time - a | 
 | name that is not yet in the dcache - the shared lock on ``i_rwsem`` will | 
 | not prevent them both adding new dentries with the same name.  As this | 
 | would result in confusion an extra level of interlocking is used, | 
 | based around a secondary hash table (``in_lookup_hashtable``) and a | 
 | per-dentry flag bit (``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``). | 
 |  | 
 | To add a new dentry to the cache while only holding a shared lock on | 
 | ``i_rwsem``, a thread must call ``d_alloc_parallel()``.  This allocates a | 
 | dentry, stores the required name and parent in it, checks if there | 
 | is already a matching dentry in the primary or secondary hash | 
 | tables, and if not, stores the newly allocated dentry in the secondary | 
 | hash table, with ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` set. | 
 |  | 
 | If a matching dentry was found in the primary hash table then that is | 
 | returned and the caller can know that it lost a race with some other | 
 | thread adding the entry.  If no matching dentry is found in either | 
 | cache, the newly allocated dentry is returned and the caller can | 
 | detect this from the presence of ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP``.  In this case it | 
 | knows that it has won any race and now is responsible for asking the | 
 | filesystem to perform the lookup and find the matching inode.  When | 
 | the lookup is complete, it must call ``d_lookup_done()`` which clears | 
 | the flag and does some other house keeping, including removing the | 
 | dentry from the secondary hash table - it will normally have been | 
 | added to the primary hash table already.  Note that a ``struct | 
 | waitqueue_head`` is passed to ``d_alloc_parallel()``, and | 
 | ``d_lookup_done()`` must be called while this ``waitqueue_head`` is still | 
 | in scope. | 
 |  | 
 | If a matching dentry is found in the secondary hash table, | 
 | ``d_alloc_parallel()`` has a little more work to do. It first waits for | 
 | ``DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP`` to be cleared, using a wait_queue that was passed | 
 | to the instance of ``d_alloc_parallel()`` that won the race and that | 
 | will be woken by the call to ``d_lookup_done()``.  It then checks to see | 
 | if the dentry has now been added to the primary hash table.  If it | 
 | has, the dentry is returned and the caller just sees that it lost any | 
 | race.  If it hasn't been added to the primary hash table, the most | 
 | likely explanation is that some other dentry was added instead using | 
 | ``d_splice_alias()``.  In any case, ``d_alloc_parallel()`` repeats all the | 
 | look ups from the start and will normally return something from the | 
 | primary hash table. | 
 |  | 
 | mnt->mnt_count | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | ``mnt_count`` is a per-CPU reference counter on "``mount``" structures. | 
 | Per-CPU here means that incrementing the count is cheap as it only | 
 | uses CPU-local memory, but checking if the count is zero is expensive as | 
 | it needs to check with every CPU.  Taking a ``mnt_count`` reference | 
 | prevents the mount structure from disappearing as the result of regular | 
 | unmount operations, but does not prevent a "lazy" unmount.  So holding | 
 | ``mnt_count`` doesn't ensure that the mount remains in the namespace and, | 
 | in particular, doesn't stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry.  It | 
 | does, however, ensure that the ``mount`` data structure remains coherent, | 
 | and it provides a reference to the root dentry of the mounted | 
 | filesystem.  So a reference through ``->mnt_count`` provides a stable | 
 | reference to the mounted dentry, but not the mounted-on dentry. | 
 |  | 
 | mount_lock | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | ``mount_lock`` is a global seqlock, a bit like ``rename_lock``.  It can be used to | 
 | check if any change has been made to any mount points. | 
 |  | 
 | While walking down the tree (away from the root) this lock is used when | 
 | crossing a mount point to check that the crossing was safe.  That is, | 
 | the value in the seqlock is read, then the code finds the mount that | 
 | is mounted on the current directory, if there is one, and increments | 
 | the ``mnt_count``.  Finally the value in ``mount_lock`` is checked against | 
 | the old value.  If there is no change, then the crossing was safe.  If there | 
 | was a change, the ``mnt_count`` is decremented and the whole process is | 
 | retried. | 
 |  | 
 | When walking up the tree (towards the root) by following a ".." link, | 
 | a little more care is needed.  In this case the seqlock (which | 
 | contains both a counter and a spinlock) is fully locked to prevent | 
 | any changes to any mount points while stepping up.  This locking is | 
 | needed to stabilize the link to the mounted-on dentry, which the | 
 | refcount on the mount itself doesn't ensure. | 
 |  | 
 | ``mount_lock`` is also used to detect and defend against potential attacks | 
 | against ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` and ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` when resolving ".." (where | 
 | the parent directory is moved outside the root, bypassing the ``path_equal()`` | 
 | check). If ``mount_lock`` is updated during the lookup and the path encounters | 
 | a "..", a potential attack occurred and ``handle_dots()`` will bail out with | 
 | ``-EAGAIN``. | 
 |  | 
 | RCU | 
 | ~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Finally the global (but extremely lightweight) RCU read lock is held | 
 | from time to time to ensure certain data structures don't get freed | 
 | unexpectedly. | 
 |  | 
 | In particular it is held while scanning chains in the dcache hash | 
 | table, and the mount point hash table. | 
 |  | 
 | Bringing it together with ``struct nameidata`` | 
 | ---------------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | .. _First edition Unix: https://minnie.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V1/u2.s | 
 |  | 
 | Throughout the process of walking a path, the current status is stored | 
 | in a ``struct nameidata``, "namei" being the traditional name - dating | 
 | all the way back to `First Edition Unix`_ - of the function that | 
 | converts a "name" to an "inode".  ``struct nameidata`` contains (among | 
 | other fields): | 
 |  | 
 | ``struct path path`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | A ``path`` contains a ``struct vfsmount`` (which is | 
 | embedded in a ``struct mount``) and a ``struct dentry``.  Together these | 
 | record the current status of the walk.  They start out referring to the | 
 | starting point (the current working directory, the root directory, or some other | 
 | directory identified by a file descriptor), and are updated on each | 
 | step.  A reference through ``d_lockref`` and ``mnt_count`` is always | 
 | held. | 
 |  | 
 | ``struct qstr last`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | This is a string together with a length (i.e. *not* ``nul`` terminated) | 
 | that is the "next" component in the pathname. | 
 |  | 
 | ``int last_type`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | This is one of ``LAST_NORM``, ``LAST_ROOT``, ``LAST_DOT`` or ``LAST_DOTDOT``. | 
 | The ``last`` field is only valid if the type is ``LAST_NORM``. | 
 |  | 
 | ``struct path root`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | This is used to hold a reference to the effective root of the | 
 | filesystem.  Often that reference won't be needed, so this field is | 
 | only assigned the first time it is used, or when a non-standard root | 
 | is requested.  Keeping a reference in the ``nameidata`` ensures that | 
 | only one root is in effect for the entire path walk, even if it races | 
 | with a ``chroot()`` system call. | 
 |  | 
 | It should be noted that in the case of ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` or | 
 | ``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, the effective root becomes the directory file descriptor | 
 | passed to ``openat2()`` (which exposes these ``LOOKUP_`` flags). | 
 |  | 
 | The root is needed when either of two conditions holds: (1) either the | 
 | pathname or a symbolic link starts with a "'/'", or (2) a "``..``" | 
 | component is being handled, since "``..``" from the root must always stay | 
 | at the root.  The value used is usually the current root directory of | 
 | the calling process.  An alternate root can be provided as when | 
 | ``sysctl()`` calls ``file_open_root()``, and when NFSv4 or Btrfs call | 
 | ``mount_subtree()``.  In each case a pathname is being looked up in a very | 
 | specific part of the filesystem, and the lookup must not be allowed to | 
 | escape that subtree.  It works a bit like a local ``chroot()``. | 
 |  | 
 | Ignoring the handling of symbolic links, we can now describe the | 
 | "``link_path_walk()``" function, which handles the lookup of everything | 
 | except the final component as: | 
 |  | 
 |    Given a path (``name``) and a nameidata structure (``nd``), check that the | 
 |    current directory has execute permission and then advance ``name`` | 
 |    over one component while updating ``last_type`` and ``last``.  If that | 
 |    was the final component, then return, otherwise call | 
 |    ``walk_component()`` and repeat from the top. | 
 |  | 
 | ``walk_component()`` is even easier.  If the component is ``LAST_DOTS``, | 
 | it calls ``handle_dots()`` which does the necessary locking as already | 
 | described.  If it finds a ``LAST_NORM`` component it first calls | 
 | "``lookup_fast()``" which only looks in the dcache, but will ask the | 
 | filesystem to revalidate the result if it is that sort of filesystem. | 
 | If that doesn't get a good result, it calls "``lookup_slow()``" which | 
 | takes ``i_rwsem``, rechecks the cache, and then asks the filesystem | 
 | to find a definitive answer. | 
 |  | 
 | As the last step of walk_component(), step_into() will be called either | 
 | directly from walk_component() or from handle_dots().  It calls | 
 | handle_mounts(), to check and handle mount points, in which a new | 
 | ``struct path`` is created containing a counted reference to the new dentry and | 
 | a reference to the new ``vfsmount`` which is only counted if it is | 
 | different from the previous ``vfsmount``. Then if there is | 
 | a symbolic link, step_into() calls pick_link() to deal with it, | 
 | otherwise it installs the new ``struct path`` in the ``struct nameidata``, and | 
 | drops the unneeded references. | 
 |  | 
 | This "hand-over-hand" sequencing of getting a reference to the new | 
 | dentry before dropping the reference to the previous dentry may | 
 | seem obvious, but is worth pointing out so that we will recognize its | 
 | analogue in the "RCU-walk" version. | 
 |  | 
 | Handling the final component | 
 | ---------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | ``link_path_walk()`` only walks as far as setting ``nd->last`` and | 
 | ``nd->last_type`` to refer to the final component of the path.  It does | 
 | not call ``walk_component()`` that last time.  Handling that final | 
 | component remains for the caller to sort out. Those callers are | 
 | path_lookupat(), path_parentat() and | 
 | path_openat() each of which handles the differing requirements of | 
 | different system calls. | 
 |  | 
 | ``path_parentat()`` is clearly the simplest - it just wraps a little bit | 
 | of housekeeping around ``link_path_walk()`` and returns the parent | 
 | directory and final component to the caller.  The caller will be either | 
 | aiming to create a name (via ``filename_create()``) or remove or rename | 
 | a name (in which case ``user_path_parent()`` is used).  They will use | 
 | ``i_rwsem`` to exclude other changes while they validate and then | 
 | perform their operation. | 
 |  | 
 | ``path_lookupat()`` is nearly as simple - it is used when an existing | 
 | object is wanted such as by ``stat()`` or ``chmod()``.  It essentially just | 
 | calls ``walk_component()`` on the final component through a call to | 
 | ``lookup_last()``.  ``path_lookupat()`` returns just the final dentry. | 
 | It is worth noting that when flag ``LOOKUP_MOUNTPOINT`` is set, | 
 | path_lookupat() will unset LOOKUP_JUMPED in nameidata so that in the | 
 | subsequent path traversal d_weak_revalidate() won't be called. | 
 | This is important when unmounting a filesystem that is inaccessible, such as | 
 | one provided by a dead NFS server. | 
 |  | 
 | Finally ``path_openat()`` is used for the ``open()`` system call; it | 
 | contains, in support functions starting with "open_last_lookups()", all the | 
 | complexity needed to handle the different subtleties of O_CREAT (with | 
 | or without O_EXCL), final "``/``" characters, and trailing symbolic | 
 | links.  We will revisit this in the final part of this series, which | 
 | focuses on those symbolic links.  "open_last_lookups()" will sometimes, but | 
 | not always, take ``i_rwsem``, depending on what it finds. | 
 |  | 
 | Each of these, or the functions which call them, need to be alert to | 
 | the possibility that the final component is not ``LAST_NORM``.  If the | 
 | goal of the lookup is to create something, then any value for | 
 | ``last_type`` other than ``LAST_NORM`` will result in an error.  For | 
 | example if ``path_parentat()`` reports ``LAST_DOTDOT``, then the caller | 
 | won't try to create that name.  They also check for trailing slashes | 
 | by testing ``last.name[last.len]``.  If there is any character beyond | 
 | the final component, it must be a trailing slash. | 
 |  | 
 | Revalidation and automounts | 
 | --------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Apart from symbolic links, there are only two parts of the "REF-walk" | 
 | process not yet covered.  One is the handling of stale cache entries | 
 | and the other is automounts. | 
 |  | 
 | On filesystems that require it, the lookup routines will call the | 
 | ``->d_revalidate()`` dentry method to ensure that the cached information | 
 | is current.  This will often confirm validity or update a few details | 
 | from a server.  In some cases it may find that there has been change | 
 | further up the path and that something that was thought to be valid | 
 | previously isn't really.  When this happens the lookup of the whole | 
 | path is aborted and retried with the "``LOOKUP_REVAL``" flag set.  This | 
 | forces revalidation to be more thorough.  We will see more details of | 
 | this retry process in the next article. | 
 |  | 
 | Automount points are locations in the filesystem where an attempt to | 
 | lookup a name can trigger changes to how that lookup should be | 
 | handled, in particular by mounting a filesystem there.  These are | 
 | covered in greater detail in autofs.rst in the Linux documentation | 
 | tree, but a few notes specifically related to path lookup are in order | 
 | here. | 
 |  | 
 | The Linux VFS has a concept of "managed" dentries.  There are three | 
 | potentially interesting things about these dentries corresponding | 
 | to three different flags that might be set in ``dentry->d_flags``: | 
 |  | 
 | ``DCACHE_MANAGE_TRANSIT`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | If this flag has been set, then the filesystem has requested that the | 
 | ``d_manage()`` dentry operation be called before handling any possible | 
 | mount point.  This can perform two particular services: | 
 |  | 
 | It can block to avoid races.  If an automount point is being | 
 | unmounted, the ``d_manage()`` function will usually wait for that | 
 | process to complete before letting the new lookup proceed and possibly | 
 | trigger a new automount. | 
 |  | 
 | It can selectively allow only some processes to transit through a | 
 | mount point.  When a server process is managing automounts, it may | 
 | need to access a directory without triggering normal automount | 
 | processing.  That server process can identify itself to the ``autofs`` | 
 | filesystem, which will then give it a special pass through | 
 | ``d_manage()`` by returning ``-EISDIR``. | 
 |  | 
 | ``DCACHE_MOUNTED`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | This flag is set on every dentry that is mounted on.  As Linux | 
 | supports multiple filesystem namespaces, it is possible that the | 
 | dentry may not be mounted on in *this* namespace, just in some | 
 | other.  So this flag is seen as a hint, not a promise. | 
 |  | 
 | If this flag is set, and ``d_manage()`` didn't return ``-EISDIR``, | 
 | ``lookup_mnt()`` is called to examine the mount hash table (honoring the | 
 | ``mount_lock`` described earlier) and possibly return a new ``vfsmount`` | 
 | and a new ``dentry`` (both with counted references). | 
 |  | 
 | ``DCACHE_NEED_AUTOMOUNT`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | If ``d_manage()`` allowed us to get this far, and ``lookup_mnt()`` didn't | 
 | find a mount point, then this flag causes the ``d_automount()`` dentry | 
 | operation to be called. | 
 |  | 
 | The ``d_automount()`` operation can be arbitrarily complex and may | 
 | communicate with server processes etc. but it should ultimately either | 
 | report that there was an error, that there was nothing to mount, or | 
 | should provide an updated ``struct path`` with new ``dentry`` and ``vfsmount``. | 
 |  | 
 | In the latter case, ``finish_automount()`` will be called to safely | 
 | install the new mount point into the mount table. | 
 |  | 
 | There is no new locking of import here and it is important that no | 
 | locks (only counted references) are held over this processing due to | 
 | the very real possibility of extended delays. | 
 | This will become more important next time when we examine RCU-walk | 
 | which is particularly sensitive to delays. | 
 |  | 
 | RCU-walk - faster pathname lookup in Linux | 
 | ========================================== | 
 |  | 
 | RCU-walk is another algorithm for performing pathname lookup in Linux. | 
 | It is in many ways similar to REF-walk and the two share quite a bit | 
 | of code.  The significant difference in RCU-walk is how it allows for | 
 | the possibility of concurrent access. | 
 |  | 
 | We noted that REF-walk is complex because there are numerous details | 
 | and special cases.  RCU-walk reduces this complexity by simply | 
 | refusing to handle a number of cases -- it instead falls back to | 
 | REF-walk.  The difficulty with RCU-walk comes from a different | 
 | direction: unfamiliarity.  The locking rules when depending on RCU are | 
 | quite different from traditional locking, so we will spend a little extra | 
 | time when we come to those. | 
 |  | 
 | Clear demarcation of roles | 
 | -------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | The easiest way to manage concurrency is to forcibly stop any other | 
 | thread from changing the data structures that a given thread is | 
 | looking at.  In cases where no other thread would even think of | 
 | changing the data and lots of different threads want to read at the | 
 | same time, this can be very costly.  Even when using locks that permit | 
 | multiple concurrent readers, the simple act of updating the count of | 
 | the number of current readers can impose an unwanted cost.  So the | 
 | goal when reading a shared data structure that no other process is | 
 | changing is to avoid writing anything to memory at all.  Take no | 
 | locks, increment no counts, leave no footprints. | 
 |  | 
 | The REF-walk mechanism already described certainly doesn't follow this | 
 | principle, but then it is really designed to work when there may well | 
 | be other threads modifying the data.  RCU-walk, in contrast, is | 
 | designed for the common situation where there are lots of frequent | 
 | readers and only occasional writers.  This may not be common in all | 
 | parts of the filesystem tree, but in many parts it will be.  For the | 
 | other parts it is important that RCU-walk can quickly fall back to | 
 | using REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | Pathname lookup always starts in RCU-walk mode but only remains there | 
 | as long as what it is looking for is in the cache and is stable.  It | 
 | dances lightly down the cached filesystem image, leaving no footprints | 
 | and carefully watching where it is, to be sure it doesn't trip.  If it | 
 | notices that something has changed or is changing, or if something | 
 | isn't in the cache, then it tries to stop gracefully and switch to | 
 | REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | This stopping requires getting a counted reference on the current | 
 | ``vfsmount`` and ``dentry``, and ensuring that these are still valid - | 
 | that a path walk with REF-walk would have found the same entries. | 
 | This is an invariant that RCU-walk must guarantee.  It can only make | 
 | decisions, such as selecting the next step, that are decisions which | 
 | REF-walk could also have made if it were walking down the tree at the | 
 | same time.  If the graceful stop succeeds, the rest of the path is | 
 | processed with the reliable, if slightly sluggish, REF-walk.  If | 
 | RCU-walk finds it cannot stop gracefully, it simply gives up and | 
 | restarts from the top with REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | This pattern of "try RCU-walk, if that fails try REF-walk" can be | 
 | clearly seen in functions like filename_lookup(), | 
 | filename_parentat(), | 
 | do_filp_open(), and do_file_open_root().  These four | 
 | correspond roughly to the three ``path_*()`` functions we met earlier, | 
 | each of which calls ``link_path_walk()``.  The ``path_*()`` functions are | 
 | called using different mode flags until a mode is found which works. | 
 | They are first called with ``LOOKUP_RCU`` set to request "RCU-walk".  If | 
 | that fails with the error ``ECHILD`` they are called again with no | 
 | special flag to request "REF-walk".  If either of those report the | 
 | error ``ESTALE`` a final attempt is made with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` set (and no | 
 | ``LOOKUP_RCU``) to ensure that entries found in the cache are forcibly | 
 | revalidated - normally entries are only revalidated if the filesystem | 
 | determines that they are too old to trust. | 
 |  | 
 | The ``LOOKUP_RCU`` attempt may drop that flag internally and switch to | 
 | REF-walk, but will never then try to switch back to RCU-walk.  Places | 
 | that trip up RCU-walk are much more likely to be near the leaves and | 
 | so it is very unlikely that there will be much, if any, benefit from | 
 | switching back. | 
 |  | 
 | RCU and seqlocks: fast and light | 
 | -------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | RCU is, unsurprisingly, critical to RCU-walk mode.  The | 
 | ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held for the entire time that RCU-walk is walking | 
 | down a path.  The particular guarantee it provides is that the key | 
 | data structures - dentries, inodes, super_blocks, and mounts - will | 
 | not be freed while the lock is held.  They might be unlinked or | 
 | invalidated in one way or another, but the memory will not be | 
 | repurposed so values in various fields will still be meaningful.  This | 
 | is the only guarantee that RCU provides; everything else is done using | 
 | seqlocks. | 
 |  | 
 | As we saw above, REF-walk holds a counted reference to the current | 
 | dentry and the current vfsmount, and does not release those references | 
 | before taking references to the "next" dentry or vfsmount.  It also | 
 | sometimes takes the ``d_lock`` spinlock.  These references and locks are | 
 | taken to prevent certain changes from happening.  RCU-walk must not | 
 | take those references or locks and so cannot prevent such changes. | 
 | Instead, it checks to see if a change has been made, and aborts or | 
 | retries if it has. | 
 |  | 
 | To preserve the invariant mentioned above (that RCU-walk may only make | 
 | decisions that REF-walk could have made), it must make the checks at | 
 | or near the same places that REF-walk holds the references.  So, when | 
 | REF-walk increments a reference count or takes a spinlock, RCU-walk | 
 | samples the status of a seqlock using ``read_seqcount_begin()`` or a | 
 | similar function.  When REF-walk decrements the count or drops the | 
 | lock, RCU-walk checks if the sampled status is still valid using | 
 | ``read_seqcount_retry()`` or similar. | 
 |  | 
 | However, there is a little bit more to seqlocks than that.  If | 
 | RCU-walk accesses two different fields in a seqlock-protected | 
 | structure, or accesses the same field twice, there is no a priori | 
 | guarantee of any consistency between those accesses.  When consistency | 
 | is needed - which it usually is - RCU-walk must take a copy and then | 
 | use ``read_seqcount_retry()`` to validate that copy. | 
 |  | 
 | ``read_seqcount_retry()`` not only checks the sequence number, but also | 
 | imposes a memory barrier so that no memory-read instruction from | 
 | *before* the call can be delayed until *after* the call, either by the | 
 | CPU or by the compiler.  A simple example of this can be seen in | 
 | ``slow_dentry_cmp()`` which, for filesystems which do not use simple | 
 | byte-wise name equality, calls into the filesystem to compare a name | 
 | against a dentry.  The length and name pointer are copied into local | 
 | variables, then ``read_seqcount_retry()`` is called to confirm the two | 
 | are consistent, and only then is ``->d_compare()`` called.  When | 
 | standard filename comparison is used, ``dentry_cmp()`` is called | 
 | instead.  Notably it does *not* use ``read_seqcount_retry()``, but | 
 | instead has a large comment explaining why the consistency guarantee | 
 | isn't necessary.  A subsequent ``read_seqcount_retry()`` will be | 
 | sufficient to catch any problem that could occur at this point. | 
 |  | 
 | With that little refresher on seqlocks out of the way we can look at | 
 | the bigger picture of how RCU-walk uses seqlocks. | 
 |  | 
 | ``mount_lock`` and ``nd->m_seq`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | We already met the ``mount_lock`` seqlock when REF-walk used it to | 
 | ensure that crossing a mount point is performed safely.  RCU-walk uses | 
 | it for that too, but for quite a bit more. | 
 |  | 
 | Instead of taking a counted reference to each ``vfsmount`` as it | 
 | descends the tree, RCU-walk samples the state of ``mount_lock`` at the | 
 | start of the walk and stores this initial sequence number in the | 
 | ``struct nameidata`` in the ``m_seq`` field.  This one lock and one | 
 | sequence number are used to validate all accesses to all ``vfsmounts``, | 
 | and all mount point crossings.  As changes to the mount table are | 
 | relatively rare, it is reasonable to fall back on REF-walk any time | 
 | that any "mount" or "unmount" happens. | 
 |  | 
 | ``m_seq`` is checked (using ``read_seqretry()``) at the end of an RCU-walk | 
 | sequence, whether switching to REF-walk for the rest of the path or | 
 | when the end of the path is reached.  It is also checked when stepping | 
 | down over a mount point (in ``__follow_mount_rcu()``) or up (in | 
 | ``follow_dotdot_rcu()``).  If it is ever found to have changed, the | 
 | whole RCU-walk sequence is aborted and the path is processed again by | 
 | REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | If RCU-walk finds that ``mount_lock`` hasn't changed then it can be sure | 
 | that, had REF-walk taken counted references on each vfsmount, the | 
 | results would have been the same.  This ensures the invariant holds, | 
 | at least for vfsmount structures. | 
 |  | 
 | ``dentry->d_seq`` and ``nd->seq`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | In place of taking a count or lock on ``d_reflock``, RCU-walk samples | 
 | the per-dentry ``d_seq`` seqlock, and stores the sequence number in the | 
 | ``seq`` field of the nameidata structure, so ``nd->seq`` should always be | 
 | the current sequence number of ``nd->dentry``.  This number needs to be | 
 | revalidated after copying, and before using, the name, parent, or | 
 | inode of the dentry. | 
 |  | 
 | The handling of the name we have already looked at, and the parent is | 
 | only accessed in ``follow_dotdot_rcu()`` which fairly trivially follows | 
 | the required pattern, though it does so for three different cases. | 
 |  | 
 | When not at a mount point, ``d_parent`` is followed and its ``d_seq`` is | 
 | collected.  When we are at a mount point, we instead follow the | 
 | ``mnt->mnt_mountpoint`` link to get a new dentry and collect its | 
 | ``d_seq``.  Then, after finally finding a ``d_parent`` to follow, we must | 
 | check if we have landed on a mount point and, if so, must find that | 
 | mount point and follow the ``mnt->mnt_root`` link.  This would imply a | 
 | somewhat unusual, but certainly possible, circumstance where the | 
 | starting point of the path lookup was in part of the filesystem that | 
 | was mounted on, and so not visible from the root. | 
 |  | 
 | The inode pointer, stored in ``->d_inode``, is a little more | 
 | interesting.  The inode will always need to be accessed at least | 
 | twice, once to determine if it is NULL and once to verify access | 
 | permissions.  Symlink handling requires a validated inode pointer too. | 
 | Rather than revalidating on each access, a copy is made on the first | 
 | access and it is stored in the ``inode`` field of ``nameidata`` from where | 
 | it can be safely accessed without further validation. | 
 |  | 
 | ``lookup_fast()`` is the only lookup routine that is used in RCU-mode, | 
 | ``lookup_slow()`` being too slow and requiring locks.  It is in | 
 | ``lookup_fast()`` that we find the important "hand over hand" tracking | 
 | of the current dentry. | 
 |  | 
 | The current ``dentry`` and current ``seq`` number are passed to | 
 | ``__d_lookup_rcu()`` which, on success, returns a new ``dentry`` and a | 
 | new ``seq`` number.  ``lookup_fast()`` then copies the inode pointer and | 
 | revalidates the new ``seq`` number.  It then validates the old ``dentry`` | 
 | with the old ``seq`` number one last time and only then continues.  This | 
 | process of getting the ``seq`` number of the new dentry and then | 
 | checking the ``seq`` number of the old exactly mirrors the process of | 
 | getting a counted reference to the new dentry before dropping that for | 
 | the old dentry which we saw in REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | No ``inode->i_rwsem`` or even ``rename_lock`` | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | A semaphore is a fairly heavyweight lock that can only be taken when it is | 
 | permissible to sleep.  As ``rcu_read_lock()`` forbids sleeping, | 
 | ``inode->i_rwsem`` plays no role in RCU-walk.  If some other thread does | 
 | take ``i_rwsem`` and modifies the directory in a way that RCU-walk needs | 
 | to notice, the result will be either that RCU-walk fails to find the | 
 | dentry that it is looking for, or it will find a dentry which | 
 | ``read_seqretry()`` won't validate.  In either case it will drop down to | 
 | REF-walk mode which can take whatever locks are needed. | 
 |  | 
 | Though ``rename_lock`` could be used by RCU-walk as it doesn't require | 
 | any sleeping, RCU-walk doesn't bother.  REF-walk uses ``rename_lock`` to | 
 | protect against the possibility of hash chains in the dcache changing | 
 | while they are being searched.  This can result in failing to find | 
 | something that actually is there.  When RCU-walk fails to find | 
 | something in the dentry cache, whether it is really there or not, it | 
 | already drops down to REF-walk and tries again with appropriate | 
 | locking.  This neatly handles all cases, so adding extra checks on | 
 | rename_lock would bring no significant value. | 
 |  | 
 | ``unlazy walk()`` and ``complete_walk()`` | 
 | ----------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | That "dropping down to REF-walk" typically involves a call to | 
 | ``unlazy_walk()``, so named because "RCU-walk" is also sometimes | 
 | referred to as "lazy walk".  ``unlazy_walk()`` is called when | 
 | following the path down to the current vfsmount/dentry pair seems to | 
 | have proceeded successfully, but the next step is problematic.  This | 
 | can happen if the next name cannot be found in the dcache, if | 
 | permission checking or name revalidation couldn't be achieved while | 
 | the ``rcu_read_lock()`` is held (which forbids sleeping), if an | 
 | automount point is found, or in a couple of cases involving symlinks. | 
 | It is also called from ``complete_walk()`` when the lookup has reached | 
 | the final component, or the very end of the path, depending on which | 
 | particular flavor of lookup is used. | 
 |  | 
 | Other reasons for dropping out of RCU-walk that do not trigger a call | 
 | to ``unlazy_walk()`` are when some inconsistency is found that cannot be | 
 | handled immediately, such as ``mount_lock`` or one of the ``d_seq`` | 
 | seqlocks reporting a change.  In these cases the relevant function | 
 | will return ``-ECHILD`` which will percolate up until it triggers a new | 
 | attempt from the top using REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | For those cases where ``unlazy_walk()`` is an option, it essentially | 
 | takes a reference on each of the pointers that it holds (vfsmount, | 
 | dentry, and possibly some symbolic links) and then verifies that the | 
 | relevant seqlocks have not been changed.  If there have been changes, | 
 | it, too, aborts with ``-ECHILD``, otherwise the transition to REF-walk | 
 | has been a success and the lookup process continues. | 
 |  | 
 | Taking a reference on those pointers is not quite as simple as just | 
 | incrementing a counter.  That works to take a second reference if you | 
 | already have one (often indirectly through another object), but it | 
 | isn't sufficient if you don't actually have a counted reference at | 
 | all.  For ``dentry->d_lockref``, it is safe to increment the reference | 
 | counter to get a reference unless it has been explicitly marked as | 
 | "dead" which involves setting the counter to ``-128``. | 
 | ``lockref_get_not_dead()`` achieves this. | 
 |  | 
 | For ``mnt->mnt_count`` it is safe to take a reference as long as | 
 | ``mount_lock`` is then used to validate the reference.  If that | 
 | validation fails, it may *not* be safe to just drop that reference in | 
 | the standard way of calling ``mnt_put()`` - an unmount may have | 
 | progressed too far.  So the code in ``legitimize_mnt()``, when it | 
 | finds that the reference it got might not be safe, checks the | 
 | ``MNT_SYNC_UMOUNT`` flag to determine if a simple ``mnt_put()`` is | 
 | correct, or if it should just decrement the count and pretend none of | 
 | this ever happened. | 
 |  | 
 | Taking care in filesystems | 
 | -------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | RCU-walk depends almost entirely on cached information and often will | 
 | not call into the filesystem at all.  However there are two places, | 
 | besides the already-mentioned component-name comparison, where the | 
 | file system might be included in RCU-walk, and it must know to be | 
 | careful. | 
 |  | 
 | If the filesystem has non-standard permission-checking requirements - | 
 | such as a networked filesystem which may need to check with the server | 
 | - the ``i_op->permission`` interface might be called during RCU-walk. | 
 | In this case an extra "``MAY_NOT_BLOCK``" flag is passed so that it | 
 | knows not to sleep, but to return ``-ECHILD`` if it cannot complete | 
 | promptly.  ``i_op->permission`` is given the inode pointer, not the | 
 | dentry, so it doesn't need to worry about further consistency checks. | 
 | However if it accesses any other filesystem data structures, it must | 
 | ensure they are safe to be accessed with only the ``rcu_read_lock()`` | 
 | held.  This typically means they must be freed using ``kfree_rcu()`` or | 
 | similar. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _READ_ONCE: https://lwn.net/Articles/624126/ | 
 |  | 
 | If the filesystem may need to revalidate dcache entries, then | 
 | ``d_op->d_revalidate`` may be called in RCU-walk too.  This interface | 
 | *is* passed the dentry but does not have access to the ``inode`` or the | 
 | ``seq`` number from the ``nameidata``, so it needs to be extra careful | 
 | when accessing fields in the dentry.  This "extra care" typically | 
 | involves using  `READ_ONCE() <READ_ONCE_>`_ to access fields, and verifying the | 
 | result is not NULL before using it.  This pattern can be seen in | 
 | ``nfs_lookup_revalidate()``. | 
 |  | 
 | A pair of patterns | 
 | ------------------ | 
 |  | 
 | In various places in the details of REF-walk and RCU-walk, and also in | 
 | the big picture, there are a couple of related patterns that are worth | 
 | being aware of. | 
 |  | 
 | The first is "try quickly and check, if that fails try slowly".  We | 
 | can see that in the high-level approach of first trying RCU-walk and | 
 | then trying REF-walk, and in places where ``unlazy_walk()`` is used to | 
 | switch to REF-walk for the rest of the path.  We also saw it earlier | 
 | in ``dget_parent()`` when following a "``..``" link.  It tries a quick way | 
 | to get a reference, then falls back to taking locks if needed. | 
 |  | 
 | The second pattern is "try quickly and check, if that fails try | 
 | again - repeatedly".  This is seen with the use of ``rename_lock`` and | 
 | ``mount_lock`` in REF-walk.  RCU-walk doesn't make use of this pattern - | 
 | if anything goes wrong it is much safer to just abort and try a more | 
 | sedate approach. | 
 |  | 
 | The emphasis here is "try quickly and check".  It should probably be | 
 | "try quickly *and carefully*, then check".  The fact that checking is | 
 | needed is a reminder that the system is dynamic and only a limited | 
 | number of things are safe at all.  The most likely cause of errors in | 
 | this whole process is assuming something is safe when in reality it | 
 | isn't.  Careful consideration of what exactly guarantees the safety of | 
 | each access is sometimes necessary. | 
 |  | 
 | A walk among the symlinks | 
 | ========================= | 
 |  | 
 | There are several basic issues that we will examine to understand the | 
 | handling of symbolic links:  the symlink stack, together with cache | 
 | lifetimes, will help us understand the overall recursive handling of | 
 | symlinks and lead to the special care needed for the final component. | 
 | Then a consideration of access-time updates and summary of the various | 
 | flags controlling lookup will finish the story. | 
 |  | 
 | The symlink stack | 
 | ----------------- | 
 |  | 
 | There are only two sorts of filesystem objects that can usefully | 
 | appear in a path prior to the final component: directories and symlinks. | 
 | Handling directories is quite straightforward: the new directory | 
 | simply becomes the starting point at which to interpret the next | 
 | component on the path.  Handling symbolic links requires a bit more | 
 | work. | 
 |  | 
 | Conceptually, symbolic links could be handled by editing the path.  If | 
 | a component name refers to a symbolic link, then that component is | 
 | replaced by the body of the link and, if that body starts with a '/', | 
 | then all preceding parts of the path are discarded.  This is what the | 
 | "``readlink -f``" command does, though it also edits out "``.``" and | 
 | "``..``" components. | 
 |  | 
 | Directly editing the path string is not really necessary when looking | 
 | up a path, and discarding early components is pointless as they aren't | 
 | looked at anyway.  Keeping track of all remaining components is | 
 | important, but they can of course be kept separately; there is no need | 
 | to concatenate them.  As one symlink may easily refer to another, | 
 | which in turn can refer to a third, we may need to keep the remaining | 
 | components of several paths, each to be processed when the preceding | 
 | ones are completed.  These path remnants are kept on a stack of | 
 | limited size. | 
 |  | 
 | There are two reasons for placing limits on how many symlinks can | 
 | occur in a single path lookup.  The most obvious is to avoid loops. | 
 | If a symlink referred to itself either directly or through | 
 | intermediaries, then following the symlink can never complete | 
 | successfully - the error ``ELOOP`` must be returned.  Loops can be | 
 | detected without imposing limits, but limits are the simplest solution | 
 | and, given the second reason for restriction, quite sufficient. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _outlined recently: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1934390/focus=1934550 | 
 |  | 
 | The second reason was `outlined recently`_ by Linus: | 
 |  | 
 |    Because it's a latency and DoS issue too. We need to react well to | 
 |    true loops, but also to "very deep" non-loops. It's not about memory | 
 |    use, it's about users triggering unreasonable CPU resources. | 
 |  | 
 | Linux imposes a limit on the length of any pathname: ``PATH_MAX``, which | 
 | is 4096.  There are a number of reasons for this limit; not letting the | 
 | kernel spend too much time on just one path is one of them.  With | 
 | symbolic links you can effectively generate much longer paths so some | 
 | sort of limit is needed for the same reason.  Linux imposes a limit of | 
 | at most 40 (MAXSYMLINKS) symlinks in any one path lookup.  It previously imposed | 
 | a further limit of eight on the maximum depth of recursion, but that was | 
 | raised to 40 when a separate stack was implemented, so there is now | 
 | just the one limit. | 
 |  | 
 | The ``nameidata`` structure that we met in an earlier article contains a | 
 | small stack that can be used to store the remaining part of up to two | 
 | symlinks.  In many cases this will be sufficient.  If it isn't, a | 
 | separate stack is allocated with room for 40 symlinks.  Pathname | 
 | lookup will never exceed that stack as, once the 40th symlink is | 
 | detected, an error is returned. | 
 |  | 
 | It might seem that the name remnants are all that needs to be stored on | 
 | this stack, but we need a bit more.  To see that, we need to move on to | 
 | cache lifetimes. | 
 |  | 
 | Storage and lifetime of cached symlinks | 
 | --------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Like other filesystem resources, such as inodes and directory | 
 | entries, symlinks are cached by Linux to avoid repeated costly access | 
 | to external storage.  It is particularly important for RCU-walk to be | 
 | able to find and temporarily hold onto these cached entries, so that | 
 | it doesn't need to drop down into REF-walk. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _object-oriented design pattern: https://lwn.net/Articles/446317/ | 
 |  | 
 | While each filesystem is free to make its own choice, symlinks are | 
 | typically stored in one of two places.  Short symlinks are often | 
 | stored directly in the inode.  When a filesystem allocates a ``struct | 
 | inode`` it typically allocates extra space to store private data (a | 
 | common `object-oriented design pattern`_ in the kernel).  This will | 
 | sometimes include space for a symlink.  The other common location is | 
 | in the page cache, which normally stores the content of files.  The | 
 | pathname in a symlink can be seen as the content of that symlink and | 
 | can easily be stored in the page cache just like file content. | 
 |  | 
 | When neither of these is suitable, the next most likely scenario is | 
 | that the filesystem will allocate some temporary memory and copy or | 
 | construct the symlink content into that memory whenever it is needed. | 
 |  | 
 | When the symlink is stored in the inode, it has the same lifetime as | 
 | the inode which, itself, is protected by RCU or by a counted reference | 
 | on the dentry.  This means that the mechanisms that pathname lookup | 
 | uses to access the dcache and icache (inode cache) safely are quite | 
 | sufficient for accessing some cached symlinks safely.  In these cases, | 
 | the ``i_link`` pointer in the inode is set to point to wherever the | 
 | symlink is stored and it can be accessed directly whenever needed. | 
 |  | 
 | When the symlink is stored in the page cache or elsewhere, the | 
 | situation is not so straightforward.  A reference on a dentry or even | 
 | on an inode does not imply any reference on cached pages of that | 
 | inode, and even an ``rcu_read_lock()`` is not sufficient to ensure that | 
 | a page will not disappear.  So for these symlinks the pathname lookup | 
 | code needs to ask the filesystem to provide a stable reference and, | 
 | significantly, needs to release that reference when it is finished | 
 | with it. | 
 |  | 
 | Taking a reference to a cache page is often possible even in RCU-walk | 
 | mode.  It does require making changes to memory, which is best avoided, | 
 | but that isn't necessarily a big cost and it is better than dropping | 
 | out of RCU-walk mode completely.  Even filesystems that allocate | 
 | space to copy the symlink into can use ``GFP_ATOMIC`` to often successfully | 
 | allocate memory without the need to drop out of RCU-walk.  If a | 
 | filesystem cannot successfully get a reference in RCU-walk mode, it | 
 | must return ``-ECHILD`` and ``unlazy_walk()`` will be called to return to | 
 | REF-walk mode in which the filesystem is allowed to sleep. | 
 |  | 
 | The place for all this to happen is the ``i_op->get_link()`` inode | 
 | method. This is called both in RCU-walk and REF-walk. In RCU-walk the | 
 | ``dentry*`` argument is NULL, ``->get_link()`` can return -ECHILD to drop out of | 
 | RCU-walk.  Much like the ``i_op->permission()`` method we | 
 | looked at previously, ``->get_link()`` would need to be careful that | 
 | all the data structures it references are safe to be accessed while | 
 | holding no counted reference, only the RCU lock. A callback | 
 | ``struct delayed_called`` will be passed to ``->get_link()``: | 
 | file systems can set their own put_link function and argument through | 
 | set_delayed_call(). Later on, when VFS wants to put link, it will call | 
 | do_delayed_call() to invoke that callback function with the argument. | 
 |  | 
 | In order for the reference to each symlink to be dropped when the walk completes, | 
 | whether in RCU-walk or REF-walk, the symlink stack needs to contain, | 
 | along with the path remnants: | 
 |  | 
 | - the ``struct path`` to provide a reference to the previous path | 
 | - the ``const char *`` to provide a reference to the to previous name | 
 | - the ``seq`` to allow the path to be safely switched from RCU-walk to REF-walk | 
 | - the ``struct delayed_call`` for later invocation. | 
 |  | 
 | This means that each entry in the symlink stack needs to hold five | 
 | pointers and an integer instead of just one pointer (the path | 
 | remnant).  On a 64-bit system, this is about 40 bytes per entry; | 
 | with 40 entries it adds up to 1600 bytes total, which is less than | 
 | half a page.  So it might seem like a lot, but is by no means | 
 | excessive. | 
 |  | 
 | Note that, in a given stack frame, the path remnant (``name``) is not | 
 | part of the symlink that the other fields refer to.  It is the remnant | 
 | to be followed once that symlink has been fully parsed. | 
 |  | 
 | Following the symlink | 
 | --------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | The main loop in ``link_path_walk()`` iterates seamlessly over all | 
 | components in the path and all of the non-final symlinks.  As symlinks | 
 | are processed, the ``name`` pointer is adjusted to point to a new | 
 | symlink, or is restored from the stack, so that much of the loop | 
 | doesn't need to notice.  Getting this ``name`` variable on and off the | 
 | stack is very straightforward; pushing and popping the references is | 
 | a little more complex. | 
 |  | 
 | When a symlink is found, walk_component() calls pick_link() via step_into() | 
 | which returns the link from the filesystem. | 
 | Providing that operation is successful, the old path ``name`` is placed on the | 
 | stack, and the new value is used as the ``name`` for a while.  When the end of | 
 | the path is found (i.e. ``*name`` is ``'\0'``) the old ``name`` is restored | 
 | off the stack and path walking continues. | 
 |  | 
 | Pushing and popping the reference pointers (inode, cookie, etc.) is more | 
 | complex in part because of the desire to handle tail recursion.  When | 
 | the last component of a symlink itself points to a symlink, we | 
 | want to pop the symlink-just-completed off the stack before pushing | 
 | the symlink-just-found to avoid leaving empty path remnants that would | 
 | just get in the way. | 
 |  | 
 | It is most convenient to push the new symlink references onto the | 
 | stack in ``walk_component()`` immediately when the symlink is found; | 
 | ``walk_component()`` is also the last piece of code that needs to look at the | 
 | old symlink as it walks that last component.  So it is quite | 
 | convenient for ``walk_component()`` to release the old symlink and pop | 
 | the references just before pushing the reference information for the | 
 | new symlink.  It is guided in this by three flags: ``WALK_NOFOLLOW`` which | 
 | forbids it from following a symlink if it finds one, ``WALK_MORE`` | 
 | which indicates that it is yet too early to release the | 
 | current symlink, and ``WALK_TRAILING`` which indicates that it is on the final | 
 | component of the lookup, so we will check userspace flag ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` to | 
 | decide whether follow it when it is a symlink and call ``may_follow_link()`` to | 
 | check if we have privilege to follow it. | 
 |  | 
 | Symlinks with no final component | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | A pair of special-case symlinks deserve a little further explanation. | 
 | Both result in a new ``struct path`` (with mount and dentry) being set | 
 | up in the ``nameidata``, and result in pick_link() returning ``NULL``. | 
 |  | 
 | The more obvious case is a symlink to "``/``".  All symlinks starting | 
 | with "``/``" are detected in pick_link() which resets the ``nameidata`` | 
 | to point to the effective filesystem root.  If the symlink only | 
 | contains "``/``" then there is nothing more to do, no components at all, | 
 | so ``NULL`` is returned to indicate that the symlink can be released and | 
 | the stack frame discarded. | 
 |  | 
 | The other case involves things in ``/proc`` that look like symlinks but | 
 | aren't really (and are therefore commonly referred to as "magic-links"):: | 
 |  | 
 |      $ ls -l /proc/self/fd/1 | 
 |      lrwx------ 1 neilb neilb 64 Jun 13 10:19 /proc/self/fd/1 -> /dev/pts/4 | 
 |  | 
 | Every open file descriptor in any process is represented in ``/proc`` by | 
 | something that looks like a symlink.  It is really a reference to the | 
 | target file, not just the name of it.  When you ``readlink`` these | 
 | objects you get a name that might refer to the same file - unless it | 
 | has been unlinked or mounted over.  When ``walk_component()`` follows | 
 | one of these, the ``->get_link()`` method in "procfs" doesn't return | 
 | a string name, but instead calls nd_jump_link() which updates the | 
 | ``nameidata`` in place to point to that target.  ``->get_link()`` then | 
 | returns ``NULL``.  Again there is no final component and pick_link() | 
 | returns ``NULL``. | 
 |  | 
 | Following the symlink in the final component | 
 | -------------------------------------------- | 
 |  | 
 | All this leads to ``link_path_walk()`` walking down every component, and | 
 | following all symbolic links it finds, until it reaches the final | 
 | component.  This is just returned in the ``last`` field of ``nameidata``. | 
 | For some callers, this is all they need; they want to create that | 
 | ``last`` name if it doesn't exist or give an error if it does.  Other | 
 | callers will want to follow a symlink if one is found, and possibly | 
 | apply special handling to the last component of that symlink, rather | 
 | than just the last component of the original file name.  These callers | 
 | potentially need to call ``link_path_walk()`` again and again on | 
 | successive symlinks until one is found that doesn't point to another | 
 | symlink. | 
 |  | 
 | This case is handled by relevant callers of link_path_walk(), such as | 
 | path_lookupat(), path_openat() using a loop that calls link_path_walk(), | 
 | and then handles the final component by calling open_last_lookups() or | 
 | lookup_last(). If it is a symlink that needs to be followed, | 
 | open_last_lookups() or lookup_last() will set things up properly and | 
 | return the path so that the loop repeats, calling | 
 | link_path_walk() again.  This could loop as many as 40 times if the last | 
 | component of each symlink is another symlink. | 
 |  | 
 | Of the various functions that examine the final component,  | 
 | open_last_lookups() is the most interesting as it works in tandem | 
 | with do_open() for opening a file.  Part of open_last_lookups() runs | 
 | with ``i_rwsem`` held and this part is in a separate function: lookup_open(). | 
 |  | 
 | Explaining open_last_lookups() and do_open() completely is beyond the scope | 
 | of this article, but a few highlights should help those interested in exploring | 
 | the code. | 
 |  | 
 | 1. Rather than just finding the target file, do_open() is used after | 
 |    open_last_lookup() to open | 
 |    it.  If the file was found in the dcache, then ``vfs_open()`` is used for | 
 |    this.  If not, then ``lookup_open()`` will either call ``atomic_open()`` (if | 
 |    the filesystem provides it) to combine the final lookup with the open, or | 
 |    will perform the separate ``i_op->lookup()`` and ``i_op->create()`` steps | 
 |    directly.  In the later case the actual "open" of this newly found or | 
 |    created file will be performed by vfs_open(), just as if the name | 
 |    were found in the dcache. | 
 |  | 
 | 2. vfs_open() can fail with ``-EOPENSTALE`` if the cached information | 
 |    wasn't quite current enough.  If it's in RCU-walk ``-ECHILD`` will be returned | 
 |    otherwise ``-ESTALE`` is returned.  When ``-ESTALE`` is returned, the caller may | 
 |    retry with ``LOOKUP_REVAL`` flag set. | 
 |  | 
 | 3. An open with O_CREAT **does** follow a symlink in the final component, | 
 |    unlike other creation system calls (like ``mkdir``).  So the sequence:: | 
 |  | 
 |           ln -s bar /tmp/foo | 
 |           echo hello > /tmp/foo | 
 |  | 
 |    will create a file called ``/tmp/bar``.  This is not permitted if | 
 |    ``O_EXCL`` is set but otherwise is handled for an O_CREAT open much | 
 |    like for a non-creating open: lookup_last() or open_last_lookup() | 
 |    returns a non ``NULL`` value, and link_path_walk() gets called and the | 
 |    open process continues on the symlink that was found. | 
 |  | 
 | Updating the access time | 
 | ------------------------ | 
 |  | 
 | We previously said of RCU-walk that it would "take no locks, increment | 
 | no counts, leave no footprints."  We have since seen that some | 
 | "footprints" can be needed when handling symlinks as a counted | 
 | reference (or even a memory allocation) may be needed.  But these | 
 | footprints are best kept to a minimum. | 
 |  | 
 | One other place where walking down a symlink can involve leaving | 
 | footprints in a way that doesn't affect directories is in updating access times. | 
 | In Unix (and Linux) every filesystem object has a "last accessed | 
 | time", or "``atime``".  Passing through a directory to access a file | 
 | within is not considered to be an access for the purposes of | 
 | ``atime``; only listing the contents of a directory can update its ``atime``. | 
 | Symlinks are different it seems.  Both reading a symlink (with ``readlink()``) | 
 | and looking up a symlink on the way to some other destination can | 
 | update the atime on that symlink. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _clearest statement: https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap04.html#tag_04_08 | 
 |  | 
 | It is not clear why this is the case; POSIX has little to say on the | 
 | subject.  The `clearest statement`_ is that, if a particular implementation | 
 | updates a timestamp in a place not specified by POSIX, this must be | 
 | documented "except that any changes caused by pathname resolution need | 
 | not be documented".  This seems to imply that POSIX doesn't really | 
 | care about access-time updates during pathname lookup. | 
 |  | 
 | .. _Linux 1.3.87: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/history/history.git/diff/fs/ext2/symlink.c?id=f806c6db77b8eaa6e00dcfb6b567706feae8dbb8 | 
 |  | 
 | An examination of history shows that prior to `Linux 1.3.87`_, the ext2 | 
 | filesystem, at least, didn't update atime when following a link. | 
 | Unfortunately we have no record of why that behavior was changed. | 
 |  | 
 | In any case, access time must now be updated and that operation can be | 
 | quite complex.  Trying to stay in RCU-walk while doing it is best | 
 | avoided.  Fortunately it is often permitted to skip the ``atime`` | 
 | update.  Because ``atime`` updates cause performance problems in various | 
 | areas, Linux supports the ``relatime`` mount option, which generally | 
 | limits the updates of ``atime`` to once per day on files that aren't | 
 | being changed (and symlinks never change once created).  Even without | 
 | ``relatime``, many filesystems record ``atime`` with a one-second | 
 | granularity, so only one update per second is required. | 
 |  | 
 | It is easy to test if an ``atime`` update is needed while in RCU-walk | 
 | mode and, if it isn't, the update can be skipped and RCU-walk mode | 
 | continues.  Only when an ``atime`` update is actually required does the | 
 | path walk drop down to REF-walk.  All of this is handled in the | 
 | ``get_link()`` function. | 
 |  | 
 | A few flags | 
 | ----------- | 
 |  | 
 | A suitable way to wrap up this tour of pathname walking is to list | 
 | the various flags that can be stored in the ``nameidata`` to guide the | 
 | lookup process.  Many of these are only meaningful on the final | 
 | component, others reflect the current state of the pathname lookup, and some | 
 | apply restrictions to all path components encountered in the path lookup. | 
 |  | 
 | And then there is ``LOOKUP_EMPTY``, which doesn't fit conceptually with | 
 | the others.  If this is not set, an empty pathname causes an error | 
 | very early on.  If it is set, empty pathnames are not considered to be | 
 | an error. | 
 |  | 
 | Global state flags | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | We have already met two global state flags: ``LOOKUP_RCU`` and | 
 | ``LOOKUP_REVAL``.  These select between one of three overall approaches | 
 | to lookup: RCU-walk, REF-walk, and REF-walk with forced revalidation. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_PARENT`` indicates that the final component hasn't been reached | 
 | yet.  This is primarily used to tell the audit subsystem the full | 
 | context of a particular access being audited. | 
 |  | 
 | ``ND_ROOT_PRESET`` indicates that the ``root`` field in the ``nameidata`` was | 
 | provided by the caller, so it shouldn't be released when it is no | 
 | longer needed. | 
 |  | 
 | ``ND_JUMPED`` means that the current dentry was chosen not because | 
 | it had the right name but for some other reason.  This happens when | 
 | following "``..``", following a symlink to ``/``, crossing a mount point | 
 | or accessing a "``/proc/$PID/fd/$FD``" symlink (also known as a "magic | 
 | link"). In this case the filesystem has not been asked to revalidate the | 
 | name (with ``d_revalidate()``).  In such cases the inode may still need | 
 | to be revalidated, so ``d_op->d_weak_revalidate()`` is called if | 
 | ``ND_JUMPED`` is set when the look completes - which may be at the | 
 | final component or, when creating, unlinking, or renaming, at the penultimate component. | 
 |  | 
 | Resolution-restriction flags | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | In order to allow userspace to protect itself against certain race conditions | 
 | and attack scenarios involving changing path components, a series of flags are | 
 | available which apply restrictions to all path components encountered during | 
 | path lookup. These flags are exposed through ``openat2()``'s ``resolve`` field. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_NO_SYMLINKS`` blocks all symlink traversals (including magic-links). | 
 | This is distinctly different from ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW``, because the latter only | 
 | relates to restricting the following of trailing symlinks. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` blocks all magic-link traversals. Filesystems must | 
 | ensure that they return errors from ``nd_jump_link()``, because that is how | 
 | ``LOOKUP_NO_MAGICLINKS`` and other magic-link restrictions are implemented. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_NO_XDEV`` blocks all ``vfsmount`` traversals (this includes both | 
 | bind-mounts and ordinary mounts). Note that the ``vfsmount`` which contains the | 
 | lookup is determined by the first mountpoint the path lookup reaches -- | 
 | absolute paths start with the ``vfsmount`` of ``/``, and relative paths start | 
 | with the ``dfd``'s ``vfsmount``. Magic-links are only permitted if the | 
 | ``vfsmount`` of the path is unchanged. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_BENEATH`` blocks any path components which resolve outside the | 
 | starting point of the resolution. This is done by blocking ``nd_jump_root()`` | 
 | as well as blocking ".." if it would jump outside the starting point. | 
 | ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect attacks against the | 
 | resolution of "..". Magic-links are also blocked. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_IN_ROOT`` resolves all path components as though the starting point | 
 | were the filesystem root. ``nd_jump_root()`` brings the resolution back to | 
 | the starting point, and ".." at the starting point will act as a no-op. As with | 
 | ``LOOKUP_BENEATH``, ``rename_lock`` and ``mount_lock`` are used to detect | 
 | attacks against ".." resolution. Magic-links are also blocked. | 
 |  | 
 | Final-component flags | 
 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | 
 |  | 
 | Some of these flags are only set when the final component is being | 
 | considered.  Others are only checked for when considering that final | 
 | component. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` ensures that, if the final component is an automount | 
 | point, then the mount is triggered.  Some operations would trigger it | 
 | anyway, but operations like ``stat()`` deliberately don't.  ``statfs()`` | 
 | needs to trigger the mount but otherwise behaves a lot like ``stat()``, so | 
 | it sets ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT``, as does "``quotactl()``" and the handling of | 
 | "``mount --bind``". | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_FOLLOW`` has a similar function to ``LOOKUP_AUTOMOUNT`` but for | 
 | symlinks.  Some system calls set or clear it implicitly, while | 
 | others have API flags such as ``AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW`` and | 
 | ``UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW`` to control it.  Its effect is similar to | 
 | ``WALK_GET`` that we already met, but it is used in a different way. | 
 |  | 
 | ``LOOKUP_DIRECTORY`` insists that the final component is a directory. | 
 | Various callers set this and it is also set when the final component | 
 | is found to be followed by a slash. | 
 |  | 
 | Finally ``LOOKUP_OPEN``, ``LOOKUP_CREATE``, ``LOOKUP_EXCL``, and | 
 | ``LOOKUP_RENAME_TARGET`` are not used directly by the VFS but are made | 
 | available to the filesystem and particularly the ``->d_revalidate()`` | 
 | method.  A filesystem can choose not to bother revalidating too hard | 
 | if it knows that it will be asked to open or create the file soon. | 
 | These flags were previously useful for ``->lookup()`` too but with the | 
 | introduction of ``->atomic_open()`` they are less relevant there. | 
 |  | 
 | End of the road | 
 | --------------- | 
 |  | 
 | Despite its complexity, all this pathname lookup code appears to be | 
 | in good shape - various parts are certainly easier to understand now | 
 | than even a couple of releases ago.  But that doesn't mean it is | 
 | "finished".   As already mentioned, RCU-walk currently only follows | 
 | symlinks that are stored in the inode so, while it handles many ext4 | 
 | symlinks, it doesn't help with NFS, XFS, or Btrfs.  That support | 
 | is not likely to be long delayed. |