blob: b62ce0524651a8ae5b1ea7bbc69bf2312443ac25 [file] [log] [blame]
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:08:08 +0200
Subject: net/core: remove explicit do_softirq() from busy_poll_stop()
Since commit 217f69743681 ("net: busy-poll: allow preemption in
sk_busy_loop()") there is an explicit do_softirq() invocation after
local_bh_enable() has been invoked.
I don't understand why we need this because local_bh_enable() will
invoke do_softirq() once the softirq counter reached zero and we have
softirq-related work pending.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
net/core/dev.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5070,8 +5070,6 @@ static void busy_poll_stop(struct napi_s
if (rc == BUSY_POLL_BUDGET)
__napi_schedule(napi);
local_bh_enable();
- if (local_softirq_pending())
- do_softirq();
}
bool sk_busy_loop(struct sock *sk, int nonblock)