blob: 433c6fab418a97d4478596946478ca4ee6458029 [file] [log] [blame]
From 5dca2f5212b5d1a2b58607986b219bf60db9a07b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:41:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] net/smc: fix refcounting for non-blocking connect()
commit 301428ea3708188dc4a243e6e6b46c03b46a0fbc upstream.
If a nonblocking socket is immediately closed after connect(),
the connect worker may not have started. This results in a refcount
problem, since sock_hold() is called from the connect worker.
This patch moves the sock_hold in front of the connect worker
scheduling.
Reported-by: syzbot+4c063e6dea39e4b79f29@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 50717a37db03 ("net/smc: nonblocking connect rework")
Reviewed-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index fe4bdec855be..7c4d59524c58 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -697,8 +697,6 @@ static int __smc_connect(struct smc_sock *smc)
int smc_type;
int rc = 0;
- sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
-
if (smc->use_fallback)
return smc_connect_fallback(smc, smc->fallback_rsn);
@@ -843,6 +841,8 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
rc = kernel_connect(smc->clcsock, addr, alen, flags);
if (rc && rc != -EINPROGRESS)
goto out;
+
+ sock_hold(&smc->sk); /* sock put in passive closing */
if (flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
if (schedule_work(&smc->connect_work))
smc->connect_nonblock = 1;
--
2.7.4