blob: b19fb13dcfdc1e2b5d16650964de7c4c9086909c [file] [log] [blame]
From e39ff8024bd0599fb7970affe46195cbf1c87e0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:00:15 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] perf time-utils: Make perf_time__parse_for_ranges() more
logical
commit 929afa0092d0ea6be2fbd0ac087319092595eba6 upstream.
Explicit time ranges never contain a percent sign whereas percentage
ranges always do, so it is possible to call the correct parser.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190604130017.31207-18-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
index 20663a460df3..797dc9e3541b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/time-utils.c
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
struct perf_time_interval **ranges,
int *range_size, int *range_num)
{
+ bool has_percent = strchr(time_str, '%');
struct perf_time_interval *ptime_range;
int size, num, ret;
@@ -410,7 +411,7 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
if (!ptime_range)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str) != 0) {
+ if (has_percent) {
if (session->evlist->first_sample_time == 0 &&
session->evlist->last_sample_time == 0) {
pr_err("HINT: no first/last sample time found in perf data.\n"
@@ -432,6 +433,8 @@ int perf_time__parse_for_ranges(const char *time_str,
goto error;
}
} else {
+ if (perf_time__parse_str(ptime_range, time_str))
+ goto error_invalid;
num = 1;
}
--
2.7.4