blob: 45ce1c9e477f92dc2ae5df22ef645f16c54f3d7c [file] [log] [blame]
From a4c83c6c00752a123bbf074d2e99170b1d350b43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 14:18:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: lpfc: Fix hardlockup in lpfc_abort_handler
commit 91a52b617cdb8bf6d298892101c061d438b84a19 upstream.
In lpfc_abort_handler, the lock acquire order is hbalock (irqsave),
buf_lock (irq) and ring_lock (irq). The issue is that in two places the
locks are released out of order - the buf_lock and the hbalock - resulting
in the cpu preemption/lock flags getting restored out of order and
deadlocking the cpu.
Fix the unlock order by fully releasing the hbalocks as well.
CC: Zhangguanghui <zhang.guanghui@h3c.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191018211832.7917-7-jsmart2021@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
index 5b42a733a75f..31989b8863a1 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_scsi.c
@@ -4685,20 +4685,21 @@ lpfc_abort_handler(struct scsi_cmnd *cmnd)
ret_val = __lpfc_sli_issue_iocb(phba, LPFC_FCP_RING,
abtsiocb, 0);
}
- /* no longer need the lock after this point */
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
if (ret_val == IOCB_ERROR) {
/* Indicate the IO is not being aborted by the driver. */
iocb->iocb_flag &= ~LPFC_DRIVER_ABORTED;
lpfc_cmd->waitq = NULL;
spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
lpfc_sli_release_iocbq(phba, abtsiocb);
ret = FAILED;
goto out;
}
+ /* no longer need the lock after this point */
spin_unlock(&lpfc_cmd->buf_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&phba->hbalock, flags);
if (phba->cfg_poll & DISABLE_FCP_RING_INT)
lpfc_sli_handle_fast_ring_event(phba,
--
2.7.4