sched-Make-select_fallback_rq-cpuset-friendly.patch

From 9b66ef88fabba97473f4925cb1e18546c4ac8531 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:10:27 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Make select_fallback_rq() cpuset friendly

commit 111abc89fbfb6b34de96d95bf90bcfdfcfac901d in tip.

Introduce cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() helper to fix the cpuset problems
with select_fallback_rq(). It can be called from any context and can't use
any cpuset locks including task_lock(). It is called when the task doesn't
have online cpus in ->cpus_allowed but ttwu/etc must be able to find a
suitable cpu.

I am not proud of this patch. Everything which needs such a fat comment
can't be good even if correct. But I'd prefer to not change the locking
rules in the code I hardly understand, and in any case I believe this
simple change make the code much more correct compared to deadlocks we
currently have.

[ upstream commit: 9084bb8246ea935b98320554229e2f371f7f52fa ]

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <20100315091027.GA9155@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index eeaaee7..a73454a 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ extern int number_of_cpusets;	/* How many cpusets are defined in system? */
 extern int cpuset_init(void);
 extern void cpuset_init_smp(void);
 extern void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *mask);
+extern int cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p);
 extern nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
 #define cpuset_current_mems_allowed (current->mems_allowed)
 void cpuset_init_current_mems_allowed(void);
@@ -101,6 +102,12 @@ static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
 	cpumask_copy(mask, cpu_possible_mask);
 }
 
+static inline int cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask);
+	return cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
+}
+
 static inline nodemask_t cpuset_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p)
 {
 	return node_possible_map;
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 4eb24cf..4a7676c 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2146,6 +2146,48 @@ void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, struct cpumask *pmask)
 	mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
 }
 
+int cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	const struct cpuset *cs;
+	int cpu;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	cs = task_cs(tsk);
+	if (cs)
+		cpumask_copy(&tsk->cpus_allowed, cs->cpus_allowed);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	/*
+	 * We own tsk->cpus_allowed, nobody can change it under us.
+	 *
+	 * But we used cs && cs->cpus_allowed lockless and thus can
+	 * race with cgroup_attach_task() or update_cpumask() and get
+	 * the wrong tsk->cpus_allowed. However, both cases imply the
+	 * subsequent cpuset_change_cpumask()->set_cpus_allowed_ptr()
+	 * which takes task_rq_lock().
+	 *
+	 * If we are called after it dropped the lock we must see all
+	 * changes in tsk_cs()->cpus_allowed. Otherwise we can temporary
+	 * set any mask even if it is not right from task_cs() pov,
+	 * the pending set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fix things.
+	 */
+
+	cpu = cpumask_any_and(&tsk->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask);
+	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+		/*
+		 * Either tsk->cpus_allowed is wrong (see above) or it
+		 * is actually empty. The latter case is only possible
+		 * if we are racing with remove_tasks_in_empty_cpuset().
+		 * Like above we can temporary set any mask and rely on
+		 * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() as synchronization point.
+		 */
+		cpumask_copy(&tsk->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask);
+		cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
+	}
+
+	return cpu;
+}
+
 void cpuset_init_current_mems_allowed(void)
 {
 	nodes_setall(current->mems_allowed);
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index c38298d..c36457d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2399,9 +2399,7 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	/* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
 	if (unlikely(dest_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)) {
-		cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask);
-		dest_cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
-
+		dest_cpu = cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(p);
 		/*
 		 * Don't tell them about moving exiting tasks or
 		 * kernel threads (both mm NULL), since they never
-- 
1.7.1.1