releases/5.15.177/i2c-rcar-fix-nack-handling-when-being-a-target.patch

From e1515ecb75b454adfd9fafa809db95d082eed18c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 13:36:23 +0100
Subject: i2c: rcar: fix NACK handling when being a target

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

[ Upstream commit 093f70c134f70e4632b295240f07d2b50b74e247 ]

When this controller is a target, the NACK handling had two issues.
First, the return value from the backend was not checked on the initial
WRITE_REQUESTED. So, the driver missed to send a NACK in this case.
Also, the NACK always arrives one byte late on the bus, even in the
WRITE_RECEIVED case. This seems to be a HW issue. We should then not
rely on the backend to correctly NACK the superfluous byte as well. Fix
both issues by introducing a flag which gets set whenever the backend
requests a NACK and keep sending it until we get a STOP condition.

Fixes: de20d1857dd6 ("i2c: rcar: add slave support")
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
index 316dd378fb8c4..afefe99129001 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c
@@ -112,6 +112,8 @@
 #define ID_P_PM_BLOCKED		BIT(31)
 #define ID_P_MASK		GENMASK(31, 28)
 
+#define ID_SLAVE_NACK		BIT(0)
+
 enum rcar_i2c_type {
 	I2C_RCAR_GEN1,
 	I2C_RCAR_GEN2,
@@ -146,6 +148,7 @@ struct rcar_i2c_priv {
 	int irq;
 
 	struct i2c_client *host_notify_client;
+	u8 slave_flags;
 };
 
 #define rcar_i2c_priv_to_dev(p)		((p)->adap.dev.parent)
@@ -576,6 +579,7 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
 {
 	u32 ssr_raw, ssr_filtered;
 	u8 value;
+	int ret;
 
 	ssr_raw = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICSSR) & 0xff;
 	ssr_filtered = ssr_raw & rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICSIER);
@@ -591,7 +595,10 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
 			rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICRXTX, value);
 			rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSIER, SDE | SSR | SAR);
 		} else {
-			i2c_slave_event(priv->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, &value);
+			ret = i2c_slave_event(priv->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_REQUESTED, &value);
+			if (ret)
+				priv->slave_flags |= ID_SLAVE_NACK;
+
 			rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICRXTX);	/* dummy read */
 			rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSIER, SDR | SSR | SAR);
 		}
@@ -604,18 +611,21 @@ static bool rcar_i2c_slave_irq(struct rcar_i2c_priv *priv)
 	if (ssr_filtered & SSR) {
 		i2c_slave_event(priv->slave, I2C_SLAVE_STOP, &value);
 		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSCR, SIE | SDBS); /* clear our NACK */
+		priv->slave_flags &= ~ID_SLAVE_NACK;
 		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSIER, SAR);
 		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSSR, ~SSR & 0xff);
 	}
 
 	/* master wants to write to us */
 	if (ssr_filtered & SDR) {
-		int ret;
-
 		value = rcar_i2c_read(priv, ICRXTX);
 		ret = i2c_slave_event(priv->slave, I2C_SLAVE_WRITE_RECEIVED, &value);
-		/* Send NACK in case of error */
-		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSCR, SIE | SDBS | (ret < 0 ? FNA : 0));
+		if (ret)
+			priv->slave_flags |= ID_SLAVE_NACK;
+
+		/* Send NACK in case of error, but it will come 1 byte late :( */
+		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSCR, SIE | SDBS |
+			       (priv->slave_flags & ID_SLAVE_NACK ? FNA : 0));
 		rcar_i2c_write(priv, ICSSR, ~SDR & 0xff);
 	}
 
-- 
2.39.5