releases/6.16.2/drm-xe-migrate-prevent-infinite-recursion.patch

From 8feae911fab38c015e1af56c39aac822b149e73f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 10:38:09 +0100
Subject: drm/xe/migrate: prevent infinite recursion

From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

[ Upstream commit 9d7a1cbebbb691891671def57407ba2f8ee914e8 ]

If the buf + offset is not aligned to XE_CAHELINE_BYTES we fallback to
using a bounce buffer. However the bounce buffer here is allocated on
the stack, and the only alignment requirement here is that it's
naturally aligned to u8, and not XE_CACHELINE_BYTES. If the bounce
buffer is also misaligned we then recurse back into the function again,
however the new bounce buffer might also not be aligned, and might never
be until we eventually blow through the stack, as we keep recursing.

Instead of using the stack use kmalloc, which should respect the
power-of-two alignment request here. Fixes a kernel panic when
triggering this path through eudebug.

v2 (Stuart):
 - Add build bug check for power-of-two restriction
 - s/EINVAL/ENOMEM/

Fixes: 270172f64b11 ("drm/xe: Update xe_ttm_access_memory to use GPU for non-visible access")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Maciej Patelczyk <maciej.patelczyk@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250731093807.207572-6-matthew.auld@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 38b34e928a08ba594c4bbf7118aa3aadacd62fff)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
index 07a5161c7d5b..c0e2656a14d2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
@@ -1820,15 +1820,19 @@ int xe_migrate_access_memory(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,
 	if (!IS_ALIGNED(len, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES) ||
 	    !IS_ALIGNED((unsigned long)buf + offset, XE_CACHELINE_BYTES)) {
 		int buf_offset = 0;
+		void *bounce;
+		int err;
+
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(!is_power_of_2(XE_CACHELINE_BYTES));
+		bounce = kmalloc(XE_CACHELINE_BYTES, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!bounce)
+			return -ENOMEM;
 
 		/*
 		 * Less than ideal for large unaligned access but this should be
 		 * fairly rare, can fixup if this becomes common.
 		 */
 		do {
-			u8 bounce[XE_CACHELINE_BYTES];
-			void *ptr = (void *)bounce;
-			int err;
 			int copy_bytes = min_t(int, bytes_left,
 					       XE_CACHELINE_BYTES -
 					       (offset & XE_CACHELINE_MASK));
@@ -1837,22 +1841,22 @@ int xe_migrate_access_memory(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,
 			err = xe_migrate_access_memory(m, bo,
 						       offset &
 						       ~XE_CACHELINE_MASK,
-						       (void *)ptr,
-						       sizeof(bounce), 0);
+						       bounce,
+						       XE_CACHELINE_BYTES, 0);
 			if (err)
-				return err;
+				break;
 
 			if (write) {
-				memcpy(ptr + ptr_offset, buf + buf_offset, copy_bytes);
+				memcpy(bounce + ptr_offset, buf + buf_offset, copy_bytes);
 
 				err = xe_migrate_access_memory(m, bo,
 							       offset & ~XE_CACHELINE_MASK,
-							       (void *)ptr,
-							       sizeof(bounce), write);
+							       bounce,
+							       XE_CACHELINE_BYTES, write);
 				if (err)
-					return err;
+					break;
 			} else {
-				memcpy(buf + buf_offset, ptr + ptr_offset,
+				memcpy(buf + buf_offset, bounce + ptr_offset,
 				       copy_bytes);
 			}
 
@@ -1861,7 +1865,8 @@ int xe_migrate_access_memory(struct xe_migrate *m, struct xe_bo *bo,
 			offset += copy_bytes;
 		} while (bytes_left);
 
-		return 0;
+		kfree(bounce);
+		return err;
 	}
 
 	dma_addr = xe_migrate_dma_map(xe, buf, len + page_offset, write);
-- 
2.50.1