queue-7.2/devlink-fix-devlink_rel-reference-leak-when-notify-w.patch

From 69944b743c24748cccab46063ba7e89b2706ac87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2026 12:22:32 +0800
Subject: devlink: fix devlink_rel reference leak when notify work is pending

From: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>

[ Upstream commit c5381ae1cd1481cc431c2bd79460472c6f1d3ce3 ]

devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work_schedule() takes a reference on the
devlink_rel for the notify work and then queues the work, ignoring the
return value of schedule_delayed_work(). If the work is already pending,
nothing new is queued, the work runs only once and drops only one
reference, so the extra one is leaked together with the devlink_rel and
its index in devlink_rels.

This is easy to hit. devl_register() of a nested instance queues the
work, and if the instance is unregistered before the work has run,
devlink_rel_put() queues it again while it is still pending. The work
also keeps rescheduling itself for as long as the parent devlink lock
cannot be taken, which widens the window. Registering and unregistering
a nested devlink instance 100 times while holding the parent lock leaks
all 100 devlink_rel objects.

The reschedule path in devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work() has the same
problem: if the work was queued again while it was running, the
reference it holds is never dropped.

Drop the reference in both places when the work was already pending.
The pending work holds its own reference, so this can not be the last
one.

Fixes: c137743bce02 ("devlink: introduce object and nested devlink relationship infra")
Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20261001042232.222987-1-yanhaishuang@cmss.chinamobile.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 net/devlink/core.c | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c
index fe9f6a0a67d5b..42c16940e4c43 100644
--- a/net/devlink/core.c
+++ b/net/devlink/core.c
@@ -96,13 +96,19 @@ static void devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	return;
 
 reschedule_work:
-	schedule_delayed_work(&rel->nested_in.notify_work, 1);
+	/* The work may have been queued again meanwhile, which took its own
+	 * reference. Drop ours in that case.
+	 */
+	if (!schedule_delayed_work(&rel->nested_in.notify_work, 1))
+		__devlink_rel_put(rel);
 }
 
 static void devlink_rel_nested_in_notify_work_schedule(struct devlink_rel *rel)
 {
 	__devlink_rel_get(rel);
-	schedule_delayed_work(&rel->nested_in.notify_work, 0);
+	/* The pending work holds a reference already, drop the new one. */
+	if (!schedule_delayed_work(&rel->nested_in.notify_work, 0))
+		__devlink_rel_put(rel);
 }
 
 static struct devlink_rel *devlink_rel_alloc(void)
-- 
2.53.0