blob: fbd83a618e794013026e2c510ff30c674b26a1e0 [file] [log] [blame]
From stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Tue Nov 4 13:57:03 2008
From: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:28:14 +0100 (CET)
Subject: firewire: fix struct fw_node memory leak
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <tkrat.e499a05eaa0ec529@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Content-Disposition: INLINE
From: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
commit 77e557191701afa55ae7320d42ad6458a2ad292e upstream
With the bus_resets patch applied, it is easy to see this memory leak
by repeatedly resetting the firewire bus while running slabtop in
another window. Just watch kmalloc-32 grow and grow...
Signed-off-by: Jay Fenlason <fenlason@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
---
drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/fw-topology.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static void
update_tree(struct fw_card *card, struct fw_node *root)
{
struct list_head list0, list1;
- struct fw_node *node0, *node1;
+ struct fw_node *node0, *node1, *next1;
int i, event;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list0);
@@ -485,7 +485,9 @@ update_tree(struct fw_card *card, struct
}
node0 = fw_node(node0->link.next);
- node1 = fw_node(node1->link.next);
+ next1 = fw_node(node1->link.next);
+ fw_node_put(node1);
+ node1 = next1;
}
}