releases/5.4.49/scsi-target-loopback-fix-read-with-data-and-sensebyt.patch

From fe1deb822166a90c67638e7c33cea5acde624136 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:26:17 +0200
Subject: scsi: target: loopback: Fix READ with data and sensebytes

From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>

[ Upstream commit c68a56736c129f5dd1632856956f9c3e04bae200 ]

We use tcm_loop with tape emulations running on tcmu.

In case application reads a short tape block with a longer READ, or a long
tape block with a short READ, according to SCC spec data has to be
tranferred _and_ sensebytes with ILI set and information field containing
the residual count. Similar problem also exists when using fixed block
size in READ.

Up to now tcm_loop is not prepared to handle sensebytes if input data is
provided, as in tcm_loop_queue_data_in() it only sets SAM_STAT_GOOD and, if
necessary, the residual count.

To fix the bug, the same handling for sensebytes as present in
tcm_loop_queue_status() must be done in tcm_loop_queue_data_in() also.

After adding this handling, the two function now are nearly identical, so I
created a single function with two wrappers.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200428182617.32726-1-bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
index 3305b47fdf536..16d5a4e117a27 100644
--- a/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
+++ b/drivers/target/loopback/tcm_loop.c
@@ -545,32 +545,15 @@ static int tcm_loop_write_pending(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int tcm_loop_queue_data_in(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
+static int tcm_loop_queue_data_or_status(const char *func,
+		struct se_cmd *se_cmd, u8 scsi_status)
 {
 	struct tcm_loop_cmd *tl_cmd = container_of(se_cmd,
 				struct tcm_loop_cmd, tl_se_cmd);
 	struct scsi_cmnd *sc = tl_cmd->sc;
 
 	pr_debug("%s() called for scsi_cmnd: %p cdb: 0x%02x\n",
-		 __func__, sc, sc->cmnd[0]);
-
-	sc->result = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
-	set_host_byte(sc, DID_OK);
-	if ((se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_OVERFLOW_BIT) ||
-	    (se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_UNDERFLOW_BIT))
-		scsi_set_resid(sc, se_cmd->residual_count);
-	sc->scsi_done(sc);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int tcm_loop_queue_status(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
-{
-	struct tcm_loop_cmd *tl_cmd = container_of(se_cmd,
-				struct tcm_loop_cmd, tl_se_cmd);
-	struct scsi_cmnd *sc = tl_cmd->sc;
-
-	pr_debug("%s() called for scsi_cmnd: %p cdb: 0x%02x\n",
-		 __func__, sc, sc->cmnd[0]);
+		 func, sc, sc->cmnd[0]);
 
 	if (se_cmd->sense_buffer &&
 	   ((se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_TRANSPORT_TASK_SENSE) ||
@@ -581,7 +564,7 @@ static int tcm_loop_queue_status(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
 		sc->result = SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION;
 		set_driver_byte(sc, DRIVER_SENSE);
 	} else
-		sc->result = se_cmd->scsi_status;
+		sc->result = scsi_status;
 
 	set_host_byte(sc, DID_OK);
 	if ((se_cmd->se_cmd_flags & SCF_OVERFLOW_BIT) ||
@@ -591,6 +574,17 @@ static int tcm_loop_queue_status(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int tcm_loop_queue_data_in(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
+{
+	return tcm_loop_queue_data_or_status(__func__, se_cmd, SAM_STAT_GOOD);
+}
+
+static int tcm_loop_queue_status(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
+{
+	return tcm_loop_queue_data_or_status(__func__,
+					     se_cmd, se_cmd->scsi_status);
+}
+
 static void tcm_loop_queue_tm_rsp(struct se_cmd *se_cmd)
 {
 	struct tcm_loop_cmd *tl_cmd = container_of(se_cmd,
-- 
2.25.1