blob: 0a988fa4a6ba42079c8f58f75c77a8b1a8aca2db [file] [log] [blame]
From cb0e08205989b6cc4d04efc0233411e42b258cf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 01:51:59 +0000
Subject: rose: fix info leak via msg_name in rose_recvmsg()
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
[ Upstream commit 4a184233f21645cf0b719366210ed445d1024d72 ]
The code in rose_recvmsg() does not initialize all of the members of
struct sockaddr_rose/full_sockaddr_rose when filling the sockaddr info.
Nor does it initialize the padding bytes of the structure inserted by
the compiler for alignment. This will lead to leaking uninitialized
kernel stack bytes in net/socket.c.
Fix the issue by initializing the memory used for sockaddr info with
memset(0).
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/rose/af_rose.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -1257,6 +1257,7 @@ static int rose_recvmsg(struct kiocb *io
skb_copy_datagram_iovec(skb, 0, msg->msg_iov, copied);
if (srose != NULL) {
+ memset(srose, 0, msg->msg_namelen);
srose->srose_family = AF_ROSE;
srose->srose_addr = rose->dest_addr;
srose->srose_call = rose->dest_call;