releases/4.19.103/net_sched-fix-an-oob-access-in-cls_tcindex.patch

From foo@baz Thu 06 Feb 2020 06:56:59 AM GMT
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 21:14:35 -0800
Subject: net_sched: fix an OOB access in cls_tcindex

From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>

[ Upstream commit 599be01ee567b61f4471ee8078870847d0a11e8e ]

As Eric noticed, tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash() uses cp->hash
to compute the size of memory allocation, but cp->hash is
set again after the allocation, this caused an out-of-bound
access.

So we have to move all cp->hash initialization and computation
before the memory allocation. Move cp->mask and cp->shift together
as cp->hash may need them for computation too.

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+35d4dea36c387813ed31@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 331b72922c5f ("net: sched: RCU cls_tcindex")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/sched/cls_tcindex.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

--- a/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_tcindex.c
@@ -333,12 +333,31 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struc
 	cp->fall_through = p->fall_through;
 	cp->tp = tp;
 
+	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_HASH])
+		cp->hash = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_HASH]);
+
+	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_MASK])
+		cp->mask = nla_get_u16(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_MASK]);
+
+	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_SHIFT])
+		cp->shift = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_SHIFT]);
+
+	if (!cp->hash) {
+		/* Hash not specified, use perfect hash if the upper limit
+		 * of the hashing index is below the threshold.
+		 */
+		if ((cp->mask >> cp->shift) < PERFECT_HASH_THRESHOLD)
+			cp->hash = (cp->mask >> cp->shift) + 1;
+		else
+			cp->hash = DEFAULT_HASH_SIZE;
+	}
+
 	if (p->perfect) {
 		int i;
 
 		if (tcindex_alloc_perfect_hash(net, cp) < 0)
 			goto errout;
-		for (i = 0; i < cp->hash; i++)
+		for (i = 0; i < min(cp->hash, p->hash); i++)
 			cp->perfect[i].res = p->perfect[i].res;
 		balloc = 1;
 	}
@@ -350,15 +369,6 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struc
 	if (old_r)
 		cr = r->res;
 
-	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_HASH])
-		cp->hash = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_HASH]);
-
-	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_MASK])
-		cp->mask = nla_get_u16(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_MASK]);
-
-	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_SHIFT])
-		cp->shift = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_SHIFT]);
-
 	err = -EBUSY;
 
 	/* Hash already allocated, make sure that we still meet the
@@ -376,16 +386,6 @@ tcindex_set_parms(struct net *net, struc
 	if (tb[TCA_TCINDEX_FALL_THROUGH])
 		cp->fall_through = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_TCINDEX_FALL_THROUGH]);
 
-	if (!cp->hash) {
-		/* Hash not specified, use perfect hash if the upper limit
-		 * of the hashing index is below the threshold.
-		 */
-		if ((cp->mask >> cp->shift) < PERFECT_HASH_THRESHOLD)
-			cp->hash = (cp->mask >> cp->shift) + 1;
-		else
-			cp->hash = DEFAULT_HASH_SIZE;
-	}
-
 	if (!cp->perfect && !cp->h)
 		cp->alloc_hash = cp->hash;