blob: f343880abc34bbba7550fcb2d9389c5491758f28 [file] [log] [blame]
From foo@baz Wed 29 Jul 2020 12:42:55 PM CEST
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 12:41:46 +0100
Subject: rxrpc: Fix sendmsg() returning EPIPE due to recvmsg() returning ENODATA
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit 639f181f0ee20d3249dbc55f740f0167267180f0 ]
rxrpc_sendmsg() returns EPIPE if there's an outstanding error, such as if
rxrpc_recvmsg() indicating ENODATA if there's nothing for it to read.
Change rxrpc_recvmsg() to return EAGAIN instead if there's nothing to read
as this particular error doesn't get stored in ->sk_err by the networking
core.
Also change rxrpc_sendmsg() so that it doesn't fail with delayed receive
errors (there's no way for it to report which call, if any, the error was
caused by).
Fixes: 17926a79320a ("[AF_RXRPC]: Provide secure RxRPC sockets for use by userspace and kernel both")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c | 2 +-
net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ try_again:
list_empty(&rx->recvmsg_q) &&
rx->sk.sk_state != RXRPC_SERVER_LISTENING) {
release_sock(&rx->sk);
- return -ENODATA;
+ return -EAGAIN;
}
if (list_empty(&rx->recvmsg_q)) {
--- a/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/sendmsg.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct rxrpc_
/* this should be in poll */
sk_clear_bit(SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE, sk);
- if (sk->sk_err || (sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN))
+ if (sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN)
return -EPIPE;
more = msg->msg_flags & MSG_MORE;