blob: 8af3f286de288e1dcc2b1fd0b17159b06aa90055 [file]
From 8c8f38c77fccfe61501d26016b9c66c231a588ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:05:22 -0800
Subject: sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
[ Upstream commit b1f44e13a525d2ffb7d5afe2273b7169d6f2222e ]
The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c
@@ -302,8 +302,7 @@ void __init btfixup(void)
case 'i': /* INT */
if ((insn & 0xc1c00000) == 0x01000000) /* %HI */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffc00000) | (p[1] >> 10));
- else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000 &&
- (insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000) /* %LO */
+ else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000) /* %LO */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffffe000) | (p[1] & 0x3ff));
else {
prom_printf(insn_i, p, addr, insn);