blob: 38eea964c0a4b79e9f86855ad154321e02f7e589 [file]
From b0dc2b9bb4ab782115b964310518ee0b17784277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 15:17:09 -0700
Subject: mm, numa: really disable NUMA balancing by default on single node machines
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
commit b0dc2b9bb4ab782115b964310518ee0b17784277 upstream.
NUMA balancing is meant to be disabled by default on UMA machines but
the check is using nr_node_ids (highest node) instead of
num_online_nodes (online nodes).
The consequences are that a UMA machine with a node ID of 1 or higher
will enable NUMA balancing. This will incur useless overhead due to
minor faults with the impact depending on the workload. These are the
impact on the stats when running a kernel build on a single node machine
whose node ID happened to be 1:
vanilla patched
NUMA base PTE updates 5113158 0
NUMA huge PMD updates 643 0
NUMA page range updates 5442374 0
NUMA hint faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local faults 2109622 0
NUMA hint local percent 100 100
NUMA pages migrated 0 0
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -2517,7 +2517,7 @@ static void __init check_numabalancing_e
if (numabalancing_override)
set_numabalancing_state(numabalancing_override == 1);
- if (nr_node_ids > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
+ if (num_online_nodes() > 1 && !numabalancing_override) {
pr_info("%s automatic NUMA balancing. "
"Configure with numa_balancing= or the "
"kernel.numa_balancing sysctl",