blob: 6dc619fafb3d4596aa0175db7d76b273b93b89aa [file]
From ea32a0df00cb3601b88c38b322dc19bec06d41f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 17:26:49 -0700
Subject: scsi: lpfc: add check for loss of ndlp when sending RRQ
[ Upstream commit c8cb261a072c88ca1aff0e804a30db4c7606521b ]
There was a missing qualification of a valid ndlp structure when calling to
send an RRQ for an abort. Add the check.
Signed-off-by: Dick Kennedy <dick.kennedy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
index 57cddbc4a977..ddd29752d96d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_els.c
@@ -7065,7 +7065,10 @@ int
lpfc_send_rrq(struct lpfc_hba *phba, struct lpfc_node_rrq *rrq)
{
struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp = lpfc_findnode_did(rrq->vport,
- rrq->nlp_DID);
+ rrq->nlp_DID);
+ if (!ndlp)
+ return 1;
+
if (lpfc_test_rrq_active(phba, ndlp, rrq->xritag))
return lpfc_issue_els_rrq(rrq->vport, ndlp,
rrq->nlp_DID, rrq);
--
2.20.1