blob: ca4b440c92e9eb5c98ac80872413204c7ce4a6b6 [file] [log] [blame]
From 68e5254adb88bede68285f11fb442a4d34fb550c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 12:47:59 -0700
Subject: xhci: fix null-pointer dereference when destroying half-built segment rings
From: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
commit 68e5254adb88bede68285f11fb442a4d34fb550c upstream.
xhci_alloc_segments_for_ring() builds a list of xhci_segments and links
the tail to head at the end (forming a ring). When it bails out for OOM
reasons half-way through, it tries to destroy its half-built list with
xhci_free_segments_for_ring(), even though it is not a ring yet. This
causes a null-pointer dereference upon hitting the last element.
Furthermore, one of its callers (xhci_ring_alloc()) mistakenly believes
the output parameters to be valid upon this kind of OOM failure, and
calls xhci_ring_free() on them. Since the (incomplete) list/ring should
already be destroyed in that case, this would lead to a use after free.
This patch fixes those issues by having xhci_alloc_segments_for_ring()
destroy its half-built, non-circular list manually and destroying the
invalid struct xhci_ring in xhci_ring_alloc() with a plain kfree().
This patch should be backported to kernels as old as 2.6.31, that
contains the commit 0ebbab37422315a5d0cb29792271085bafdf38c0 "USB: xhci:
Ring allocation and initialization."
A separate patch will need to be developed for kernels older than 3.4,
since the ring allocation code was refactored in that kernel.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -205,7 +205,12 @@ static int xhci_alloc_segments_for_ring(
next = xhci_segment_alloc(xhci, cycle_state, flags);
if (!next) {
- xhci_free_segments_for_ring(xhci, *first);
+ prev = *first;
+ while (prev) {
+ next = prev->next;
+ xhci_segment_free(xhci, prev);
+ prev = next;
+ }
return -ENOMEM;
}
xhci_link_segments(xhci, prev, next, type);
@@ -258,7 +263,7 @@ static struct xhci_ring *xhci_ring_alloc
return ring;
fail:
- xhci_ring_free(xhci, ring);
+ kfree(ring);
return NULL;
}