blob: 5a2dca6466fdfbf2480b6ed716fed7ad1241658a [file] [log] [blame]
From foo@baz Mon 16 Sep 2019 01:07:00 PM CEST
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2019 23:24:21 +0800
Subject: sctp: use transport pf_retrans in sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
[ Upstream commit 10eb56c582c557c629271f1ee31e15e7a9b2558b ]
Transport should use its own pf_retrans to do the error_count
check, instead of asoc's. Otherwise, it's meaningless to make
pf_retrans per transport.
Fixes: 5aa93bcf66f4 ("sctp: Implement quick failover draft from tsvwg")
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c
@@ -542,7 +542,7 @@ static void sctp_do_8_2_transport_strike
if (net->sctp.pf_enable &&
(transport->state == SCTP_ACTIVE) &&
(transport->error_count < transport->pathmaxrxt) &&
- (transport->error_count > asoc->pf_retrans)) {
+ (transport->error_count > transport->pf_retrans)) {
sctp_assoc_control_transport(asoc, transport,
SCTP_TRANSPORT_PF,