blob: 95d8f03a0e750f88e6ec15d47b68e519b371fbc4 [file] [log] [blame]
From foo@baz Sun May 27 17:33:38 CEST 2018
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 15:40:50 +0000
Subject: arm64: Relax ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 discovery
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
[ Upstream commit e21da1c992007594d391e7b301779cf30f438691 ]
A recent update to the ARM SMCCC ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 specification
allows firmware to return a non zero, positive value to describe
that although the mitigation is implemented at the higher exception
level, the CPU on which the call is made is not affected.
Let's relax the check on the return value from ARCH_WORKAROUND_1
so that we only error out if the returned value is negative.
Fixes: b092201e0020 ("arm64: Add ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1 BP hardening support")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int enable_smccc_arch_workaround_
case PSCI_CONDUIT_HVC:
arm_smccc_1_1_hvc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if (res.a0)
+ if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
return 0;
cb = call_hvc_arch_workaround_1;
smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_hvc_start;
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static int enable_smccc_arch_workaround_
case PSCI_CONDUIT_SMC:
arm_smccc_1_1_smc(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1, &res);
- if (res.a0)
+ if ((int)res.a0 < 0)
return 0;
cb = call_smc_arch_workaround_1;
smccc_start = __smccc_workaround_1_smc_start;