blob: 70492920ba274c78aa45b4adfa3e3a386d39df7b [file] [log] [blame]
From bc476d1a48a5a417aed2d3ad666346872d8bdee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:36:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 20/85] ext4: Take page lock before looking at attached buffer_heads flags
(cherry picked from commit a827eaffff07c7d58a4cb32158cbeb4849f4e33a)
In order to check whether the buffer_heads are mapped we need to hold
page lock. Otherwise a reclaim can cleanup the attached buffer_heads.
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5298,12 +5298,21 @@ int ext4_page_mkwrite(struct vm_area_str
else
len = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE;
+ lock_page(page);
+ /*
+ * return if we have all the buffers mapped. This avoid
+ * the need to call write_begin/write_end which does a
+ * journal_start/journal_stop which can block and take
+ * long time
+ */
if (page_has_buffers(page)) {
- /* return if we have all the buffers mapped */
if (!walk_page_buffers(NULL, page_buffers(page), 0, len, NULL,
- ext4_bh_unmapped))
+ ext4_bh_unmapped)) {
+ unlock_page(page);
goto out_unlock;
+ }
}
+ unlock_page(page);
/*
* OK, we need to fill the hole... Do write_begin write_end
* to do block allocation/reservation.We are not holding