blob: 11ebcea1b70702857fc7b073b14cfb2b4ec0820d [file] [log] [blame]
From c2c92dc7916eae0ded23057404a9af50f9890b5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:51:28 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 29/85] ext4: Fix initalization of s_flex_groups
(cherry picked from commit 7ad9bb651fc2036ea94bed94da76a4b08959a911)
The s_flex_groups array should have been initialized using atomic_add
to sum up the free counts from the block groups that make up a
flex_bg. By using atomic_set, the value of the s_flex_groups array
was set to the values of the last block group in the flex_bg.
The impact of this bug is that the block and inode allocation
algorithms might not pick the best flex_bg for new allocation.
Thanks to Damien Guibouret for pointing out this problem!
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
fs/ext4/super.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1696,12 +1696,12 @@ static int ext4_fill_flex_info(struct su
gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, i, NULL);
flex_group = ext4_flex_group(sbi, i);
- atomic_set(&sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].free_inodes,
- ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, gdp));
- atomic_set(&sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].free_blocks,
- ext4_free_blks_count(sb, gdp));
- atomic_set(&sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].used_dirs,
- ext4_used_dirs_count(sb, gdp));
+ atomic_add(ext4_free_inodes_count(sb, gdp),
+ &sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].free_inodes);
+ atomic_add(ext4_free_blks_count(sb, gdp),
+ &sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].free_blocks);
+ atomic_add(ext4_used_dirs_count(sb, gdp),
+ &sbi->s_flex_groups[flex_group].used_dirs);
}
return 1;