releases/4.0.6/ring-buffer-benchmark-fix-the-wrong-sched_priority-of-producer.patch

From 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Subject: ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

From: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>

commit 108029323910c5dd1ef8fa2d10da1ce5fbce6e12 upstream.

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1433923957-67842-1-git-send-email-long.wanglong@huawei.com

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_
 
 	if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
 		struct sched_param param = {
-			.sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+			.sched_priority = producer_fifo
 		};
 		sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
 	} else