blob: 4cf5905d49ba9972c309e01a333cb03c61d3c914 [file] [log] [blame]
From a2477b0e67c52f4364a47c3ad70902bc2a61bd4c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2018 19:00:33 +0300
Subject: fuse: Don't access pipe->buffers without pipe_lock()
From: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
commit a2477b0e67c52f4364a47c3ad70902bc2a61bd4c upstream.
fuse_dev_splice_write() reads pipe->buffers to determine the size of
'bufs' array before taking the pipe_lock(). This is not safe as
another thread might change the 'pipe->buffers' between the allocation
and taking the pipe_lock(). So we end up with too small 'bufs' array.
Move the bufs allocations inside pipe_lock()/pipe_unlock() to fix this.
Fixes: dd3bb14f44a6 ("fuse: support splice() writing to fuse device")
Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -1941,11 +1941,14 @@ static ssize_t fuse_dev_splice_write(str
if (!fud)
return -EPERM;
+ pipe_lock(pipe);
+
bufs = kmalloc(pipe->buffers * sizeof(struct pipe_buffer), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!bufs)
+ if (!bufs) {
+ pipe_unlock(pipe);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
- pipe_lock(pipe);
nbuf = 0;
rem = 0;
for (idx = 0; idx < pipe->nrbufs && rem < len; idx++)