releases/4.4.16/drm-amdkfd-unbind-only-existing-processes.patch

From 121b78e679ee3ffab780115e260b2775d0cc1f73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:41:08 +0300
Subject: drm/amdkfd: unbind only existing processes

From: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>

commit 121b78e679ee3ffab780115e260b2775d0cc1f73 upstream.

When unbinding a process from a device (initiated by amd_iommu_v2), the
driver needs to make sure that process still exists in the process table.
There is a possibility that amdkfd's own notifier handler -
kfd_process_notifier_release() - was called before the unbind function
and it already removed the process from the process table.

v2:
Because there can be only one process with the specified pasid, and
because *p can't be NULL inside the hash_for_each_rcu macro, it is more
reasonable to just put the whole code inside the if statement that
compares the pasid value. That way, when we exit hash_for_each_rcu, we
simply exit the function as well.

Signed-off-by: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c |   60 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_process.c
@@ -404,42 +404,52 @@ void kfd_unbind_process_from_device(stru
 
 	idx = srcu_read_lock(&kfd_processes_srcu);
 
+	/*
+	 * Look for the process that matches the pasid. If there is no such
+	 * process, we either released it in amdkfd's own notifier, or there
+	 * is a bug. Unfortunately, there is no way to tell...
+	 */
 	hash_for_each_rcu(kfd_processes_table, i, p, kfd_processes)
-		if (p->pasid == pasid)
-			break;
+		if (p->pasid == pasid) {
 
-	srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
+			srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
 
-	BUG_ON(p->pasid != pasid);
+			pr_debug("Unbinding process %d from IOMMU\n", pasid);
 
-	mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
+			mutex_lock(&p->mutex);
 
-	if ((dev->dbgmgr) && (dev->dbgmgr->pasid == p->pasid))
-		kfd_dbgmgr_destroy(dev->dbgmgr);
+			if ((dev->dbgmgr) && (dev->dbgmgr->pasid == p->pasid))
+				kfd_dbgmgr_destroy(dev->dbgmgr);
 
-	pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);
+			pqm_uninit(&p->pqm);
 
-	pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
+			pdd = kfd_get_process_device_data(dev, p);
 
-	if (!pdd) {
-		mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
-		return;
-	}
+			if (!pdd) {
+				mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+				return;
+			}
 
-	if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
-		dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
-		pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
-	}
+			if (pdd->reset_wavefronts) {
+				dbgdev_wave_reset_wavefronts(pdd->dev, p);
+				pdd->reset_wavefronts = false;
+			}
 
-	/*
-	 * Just mark pdd as unbound, because we still need it to call
-	 * amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() in when the process exits.
-	 * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here
-	 * because the IOMMU called us.
-	 */
-	pdd->bound = false;
+			/*
+			 * Just mark pdd as unbound, because we still need it
+			 * to call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() in when the
+			 * process exits.
+			 * We don't call amd_iommu_unbind_pasid() here
+			 * because the IOMMU called us.
+			 */
+			pdd->bound = false;
+
+			mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&p->mutex);
+			return;
+		}
+
+	srcu_read_unlock(&kfd_processes_srcu, idx);
 }
 
 struct kfd_process_device *kfd_get_first_process_device_data(struct kfd_process *p)