blob: 4ef221a2a1c3a10728507bbbbc9e766cda47baf0 [file] [log] [blame]
From foo@baz Wed Aug 22 09:42:09 CEST 2018
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2018 15:54:48 +0200
Subject: NFC: pn533: Fix wrong GFP flag usage
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
[ Upstream commit ecc443c03fb14abfb8a6af5e3b2d43b5257e60f2 ]
pn533_recv_response() is an urb completion handler, so it must use
GFP_ATOMIC. pn533_usb_send_frame() OTOH runs from a regular sleeping
context, so the pn533_submit_urb_for_response() there (and only there)
can use the regular GFP_KERNEL flags.
BugLink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514134
Fixes: 9815c7cf22da ("NFC: pn533: Separate physical layer from ...")
Cc: Michael Thalmeier <michael.thalmeier@hale.at>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/pn533/usb.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static void pn533_recv_response(struct u
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
if (!urb->status) {
- skb = alloc_skb(urb->actual_length, GFP_KERNEL);
+ skb = alloc_skb(urb->actual_length, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (!skb) {
nfc_err(&phy->udev->dev, "failed to alloc memory\n");
} else {
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static int pn533_usb_send_frame(struct p
if (dev->protocol_type == PN533_PROTO_REQ_RESP) {
/* request for response for sent packet directly */
- rc = pn533_submit_urb_for_response(phy, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ rc = pn533_submit_urb_for_response(phy, GFP_KERNEL);
if (rc)
goto error;
} else if (dev->protocol_type == PN533_PROTO_REQ_ACK_RESP) {