releases/5.15.11/bpf-selftests-update-test-case-for-atomic-cmpxchg-on-r0-with-pointer.patch

From e523102cb719cbad1673b6aa2a4d5c1fa6f13799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2021 22:25:23 +0000
Subject: bpf, selftests: Update test case for atomic cmpxchg on r0 with pointer

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

commit e523102cb719cbad1673b6aa2a4d5c1fa6f13799 upstream.

Fix up unprivileged test case results for 'Dest pointer in r0' verifier tests
given they now need to reject R0 containing a pointer value, and add a couple
of new related ones with 32bit cmpxchg as well.

  root@foo:~/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf# ./test_verifier
  #0/u invalid and of negative number OK
  #0/p invalid and of negative number OK
  [...]
  #1268/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK
  #1269/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK
  #1270/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK
  #1271/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK
  #1272/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK
  Summary: 1900 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_cmpxchg.c
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	},
 	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem",
 },
 {
 	"Can't use cmpxchg on uninit src reg",
@@ -119,7 +121,7 @@
 	},
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem",
 },
 {
 	"Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 2",
@@ -140,5 +142,66 @@
 	},
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
-	.errstr_unpriv = "R5 leaks addr into mem",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem",
+},
+{
+	"Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 3",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r0 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* val = r0; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* r5 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "invalid size of register fill",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R0 leaks addr into mem",
+},
+{
+	"Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 4",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r0 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* val = r0; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* r5 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8),
+		/* r1 = *r10 */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10, -8),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = ACCEPT,
+	.result_unpriv = REJECT,
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer",
+},
+{
+	"Dest pointer in r0 - succeed, check 5",
+	.insns = {
+		/* r0 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* val = r0; */
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* r5 = &val */
+		BPF_MOV32_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_10),
+		/* r0 = atomic_cmpxchg(&val, r0, r5); */
+		BPF_ATOMIC_OP(BPF_W, BPF_CMPXCHG, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_5, -8),
+		/* r1 = *r0 */
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
+		/* exit(0); */
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	},
+	.result = REJECT,
+	.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
+	.errstr_unpriv = "R10 partial copy of pointer",
 },